[taxesareforever]

You did not provide any counter-references in your reply

Unlike you I let my references speak for themselves. I don't have to be a computer geek to go find supporting "facts" like you do. Makes me wonder how many you tossed into file 13 because they didn't agree with your theories. Naw, I don't have to wonder. It's probably full. What relevance does this have with the current discussion?

If you can't see it, check it out at B-I-B-L-E. Genesis.

[Dimensio]

Unlike you I let my references speak for themselves.

This statement does not change the fact that you have offered no relevant counter-references to show that the rebuttals to the claims of your original references are false.

I don't have to be a computer geek to go find supporting "facts" like you do.

My expertise in computer science does not change the fact that the references that you provided contain demonstratable factual errors.

Makes me wonder how many you tossed into file 13 because they didn't agree with your theories.

You again have provided no reason to believe that the rebuttals to the false claims of your references are false.

Naw, I don't have to wonder. It's probably full.

You are attempting to change the subject. You have made demonstratably incorrect claims and you have referenced demonstratably incorrect claims. You appear to be making personal attacks against me rather than acknowledge your errors or defend your claims as truthful.

If you can't see it, check it out at B-I-B-L-E. Genesis.

This does not show how an article about the past condition of the Arctic relates to the current discussion.