I made no such admission that the information that I presented was not factual.Go back and check your posts. You're continuous backstepping is getting annoying. I have responded to the references that you have presented to show that they rely upon misunderstandings and factual errors
And I have responded with references that debunk your references. Oh, by the way, in the local paper today there is an article that says the Arctic was once like Florida. Go figure. Guess they haven't accepted the teaching of Creation either.
Go back and check your posts. You're continuous backstepping is getting annoying.
You are incorrect. I have not claimed that the data points that I have referenced were not facts.
And I have responded with references that debunk your references.
No, you have not. In
post #412 I provided point-by-point refutations to an article that you presented. You did not provide any counter-references in your reply. In
post #444 I again refuted a number of claims that you presented, this time from an excerpt that you plagarized. Again, you have not provided any refutations to my rebuttal.
Oh, by the way, in the local paper today there is an article that says the Arctic was once like Florida. Go figure. Guess they haven't accepted the teaching of Creation either.
What relevance does this have with the current discussion? Moreover, what evidence have you that the claims within the article are incorrect?