Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
Before I begin forgive the format that this response is in. I thought I had HTML down for this sort of thing but apparently I was mistakent. As early as the late 18th century, scientists observed that fossils appeared sorted in "layers" arranged by their relative ages

How were their ages established just by observing?

From your supporting resource: A new species is one in which the individuals cannot mate and produce viable descendants with individuals of a preexisting species.

So tell me, when did this sudden change happen based on another article that is up your alley?

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5731/91

I hope you notice all the questionable data referenced in this article. Nothing has been verified. Matter of fact most everything is still up in the air awaiting the great enlightening. While I cannot "prove" that the theory of evolution is true

WOW! What a revelation. So if you can't prove it why is it taught as the only answer to our being? Your data cannot be proven so to me it is inconclusive and should not be taught.

Here is some helpful data from another source: To the average person, the most powerful witness to claims of vast prehistoric ages is the testimony of sometimes thousands of feet of sedimentary-rock layers and the fossils they contain. The sight of the Grand Canyon with its layer upon layer of sedimentary rock seems to imply the requirement of vast amounts of time. Evolutionists believe and propose that each layer represents an ancient world that long since perished. Recent-creationists, on the other hand, believe that these rock layers were all deposited quickly under catastrophic conditions in the relatively recent past. The occurrence of polystrate fossils in numerous places around the world is one dramatic piece of evidence that the recent-creationists may be right. In order to see why, remember that fossil formation requires rapid burial and sealing from atmospheric and surface elements. Any organic material, such as wood, that is so exposed will not turn into a fossil. Rather, it will rot. Therefore, just as with the whale in the diatomite deposit, the entire length of a fossil tree trunk had to be buried quickly in order for it to fossilize. However, in polystrate fossils, these tree trunks extend vertically and are incorporated into rock layers supposedly laid down in epochs separated by millions of years of time. The most obvious and straightforward interpretation of these fossils is that the sedimentary layers engulfing them were laid down in rapid succession during a single catastrophe in the past. They constitute a sort of frozen clock from the past, indicating that terrible things occurred—not over millions of years but very quickly.

By the way, you never answered my question of "where did the spruce tree seed come from? And since we are here please provide an explanation of why there are so many different languages if we are all descended from same kind.

305 posted on 05/21/2006 11:10:02 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: taxesareforever
How were their ages established just by observing?

Fossil ages are typically determined based upon the ages of the rock layers in which they are found. The rock layers are dated with radiometric techniques; typically, more than one applicable dating method is used as a means of obtaining matching dates.

So tell me, when did this sudden change happen based on another article that is up your alley?

This article details the investigation into the human branch of homonids. If you wish to challenge the claims in the article, please do so in a specific fashion, rather than issuing general references about speculation.

WOW! What a revelation. So if you can't prove it why is it taught as the only answer to our being? Your data cannot be proven so to me it is inconclusive and should not be taught.

By your reasoning, nothing in science should be taught, because nothing in science is "proven". Evolution is no more "inconclusive" than any other scientific theory, including electromagnetism and gravity. I do not understand why you continue to make this misrepresentation despite having explanations presented to you on more than one occasion.

Here is some helpful data from another source:

What is your reference for the source, and upon what do they base their claims that are not agreed upon by any professional geologist?

By the way, you never answered my question of "where did the spruce tree seed come from?

A previous tree life form.

And since we are here please provide an explanation of why there are so many different languages if we are all descended from same kind.

Why would you expect language to remain constant? Languages change across isolated cultures relatively quickly, far faster than changes across species.
306 posted on 05/23/2006 12:44:36 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson