[Dimensio]

Well I think ID has more acceptance among scientists than Holocaust denial has among historians, but again you are forgetting "guided evolution" which the article admits has a much higher following.

It should be noted, however, that "guided evolution" -- at least with respect to divinely guided evolution -- is not scientific, and should not be presented as such.

I say teach or at least acknowledge all three, instead of presenting one and only one side.

Then you advocate teaching two non-scientific claims -- intelligent design and divinely guided evolution -- as though they are science. I do not see such a thing as honest.

[DannyTN]

Well I simply dissagree with you that they aren't scientific. And I think my post 153, clarifies that. What is presented should be evidenced based. But there are different interpretations of the same evidence.