Another person is working on what promises to be a well-researched piece showing how it was Wilson who suggested to reporters that what the WH was saying to refute him was a Vengeance outing of his wife. In other words, he first told them his wife worked at the agency on wmd's and then "interpreted" innocuous comments from the WH as proof of the plot against him.
There is evidence in Libby's last pleadings, for example, that NBC, Mitchell (who worked for Russert), Time and Miller and the NYT had all been talking to Wilson before the reporters contacted the WH and in Cooper's case the evidence is that his co-author, Calabresi, talked to Wilson just before and just after Cooper's call to Libby.
Tracking back:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/4/121656.shtml
Sunday, Dec. 4, 2005 12:13 p.m. EST
Joe Wilson: Bush Right to Attack Iraq
Joe Wilson, Iraq war supporter?
The darling of the anti-war left may be working overtime to bring down the Bush administration for "outing" his CIA wife, but Wilson said Saturday that the White House was right to go to war over Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
"There was a lot of reason to be concerned about weapons of mass destruction in the hands of Saddam Hussein," he told WABC Radio's Mark Simone. "I always thought that he probably had chemical and biological weapons and biological precursors as well."
Wilson said his primary policy difference with President Bush wasn't over Saddam's WMDs, but rather on the question of "how to construct a policy that gets to the national security issue of disarming Saddam Hussein and does so at minimum risk to other legitimate U.S. interests both in Iraq and in the region."
But aside from that, Wilson said he cheered President Bush's decision to topple the Iraqi dictator, telling Simone: "When the president went up to the U.N. and got the [war] resolution unanimously passed at the U.N., nobody applauded louder than I did."
Clifford May's article, Who Exposed Secret Agent Plame?published in National Review online, July 15th 2005, makes a strong case that, while Novak was the first person to expose "Wilson's wife", Corn is actually the journalist responsible for first publishing Plame's undercover/covert status:
"This just in: Bob Novak did not reveal that Valerie Plame was an undercover agent for the CIA. Read or reread his column from July 14, 2003. All Novak reports is that the wife of former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson is 'an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction'...SourceSo if Novak did not reveal that Valerie Plame was a secret agent, who did? The evidence strongly suggests it was none other than Joe Wilson himself. Let me walk you through the steps that lead to this conclusion.
The first reference to Plame being a secret agent appears in The Nation, in an article by DC published July 16, 2003, just two days after Novaks column appeared. It carried this lead: 'Did Bush officials blow the cover of a U.S. intelligence officer working covertly in a field of vital importance to national security and break the law in order to strike at a Bush administration critic and intimidate others?'
On what basis could Corn 'assume' that Plame was not only working covertly but was actually a 'top-secret' operative? And where did Corn get the idea that Plame had been 'outed' in order to punish Wilson? That is not suggested by anything in the Novak column...
The likely answer: The allegation that someone in the administration leaked to Novak as a way to punish Wilson was made by Wilson to Corn. But Corn, rather than quote Wilson, puts the idea forward as his own.
Corns article then goes on to provide specific details about Plames undercover work, her 'dicey and difficult mission of tracking parties trying to buy or sell weapons of mass destruction or WMD material.' But how does Corn know about that? From what source could he have learned it?"
Since Novak did not report that Plame was 'working covertly' how did Corn know thats what she had been doing? Corn follows that assertion with a quote from Wilson saying, 'I will not answer questions about my wife.' Any reporter worth his salt would immediately wonder: Did Wilson indeed answer Corns questions about his wife after Corn agreed not to quote his answers but to use them only on background? Read the rest of Corns piece and its difficult to believe anything else. Corn names no other sources for the information he provides and he provides much more information than Novak revealed...