To: churchillbuff
USA Today reported slight gains -- """
They're selling them at the McDonalds near my house, and sometimes I'll buy one.
To: churchillbuff
Good - let these liberal rags sink.
To: churchillbuff
Could be that people are less inclined to read than they once were. I wonder if literacy is declining or whether we are just happier with electronic media these days. Maybe a combination of the two things. I'm fairly sure that standards have been lowered at schools, but I also imagine that the studen population has increased.
4 posted on
05/08/2006 8:52:24 AM PDT by
Sam Cree
(Delicacy, precision, force)
To: churchillbuff
"Thank you Lord for the blessing."
5 posted on
05/08/2006 8:54:51 AM PDT by
zerosix
(Romans 5:8)
To: churchillbuff
Daily circulation at The New York Times was up 0.5% to 1,142,464.
This saddens me to see more victims added to the liberal roster.
6 posted on
05/08/2006 8:59:39 AM PDT by
rj45mis
To: churchillbuff
Yesterday, the Boston Globe, that staunch guardian of the news and all things liberal, ran on Page 1 its in-depth analysis of why Patrick Kennedy should not be held responsible for his career of drug abuse, violence, and incompetence. The Globe carefully explained how Ambien makes its user not responsible for his behavior, and how a Kennedy can never be held responsible for his behavior because one of them was once president. The Globe set the world standard in hypocricy in 1969 when, the week Ted Kennedy killed Mary Jo Kopechni, the Globe ran on the front page of that week's Sunday edition, a big picture of Ted giving roses to his mother on the porch of one of the family mansions.
Watching the Boston Globe tank is one of my greater pleasures.
7 posted on
05/08/2006 9:04:20 AM PDT by
pabianice
To: churchillbuff
Daily circulation at The New York Times was up 0.5% to 1,142,464. I find this hard to believe. They can't even tell the truth in their pages much less factcheck, so there's no reason I believe their surely phony and inflated ciruclation figures.
10 posted on
05/08/2006 9:11:12 AM PDT by
D-Chivas
To: george76; abb; Grampa Dave
Looks like Drudge's source. MSMWOES added.
12 posted on
05/08/2006 9:13:52 AM PDT by
Milhous
(Sarcasm - the last refuge of an empty mind.)
To: churchillbuff
USA Today reported slight gains
Probably due to the free copies they give out at every hotel in the country.
17 posted on
05/08/2006 9:39:27 AM PDT by
Beckwith
(The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: churchillbuff
I'd drop the Houston Comical in a minute if we didn't want to read the Death Notices.
22 posted on
05/08/2006 10:06:19 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: churchillbuff
Maybe they should publish every other day to cut costs.
Or just once a week.
23 posted on
05/08/2006 10:07:47 AM PDT by
HitmanLV
("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
To: churchillbuff
I would guess circulation is down because more and more people are discovering Charmin provides superior cleansing, is more puncture resistant and does not leave ink residue.
43 posted on
05/09/2006 4:34:39 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(Who does not trust a man of principle? A man who has none.)
To: churchillbuff
> The Washington Times celebrated its 23rd anniversary yesterday with cake and champagne served to its employees at a midafternoon assembly, as its executives announced a substantial gain in audited circulation in the face of a national trend of declining U.S. newspaper numbers.
For the six-month period ending March 31, the newspaper's daily circulation from Monday through Friday climbed to 103,017 -- an increase of nearly 3 percent over the similar period last year, according to Fas-Fax, the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) report of publishers' estimates. <
That's from last year's report. Wonder how they did this year.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson