[SunnyD1182]

Just leave now and get it over with. You are clearly not interested in keeping Democrats out of office, which means you're for throwing in the towel on Iraq, ready to walk away from nominating conservative jurists, and in letting tax cuts expire.

Let me very clear: you just as well BE a Democrat, since you're effectively voting for one.

Who in the blue hell are you? You don't know me, you don't know who I've voted for, and you don't know I support. In fact, you know jack s**t about my politics, so don't even act like you do.

Stop antagonizing well-meaning members on this board. I've flipped back in the posts and I see all sorts of nonsense from you to people in this thread. Everyone here cares, at least to a certain extent, about getting CONSERVATIVE policy enacted. That does not mean, however, that they have to kiss George Bush's behind, and fall in lockstep with the party line or Bush line on things. Pathetic drones like you are pathetic, no matter which side of the aisle they are on.

You're a disgusting partisan hack, and you should be ashamed of yourself. For the good of the party and for the good of the conservative movement, just zip your mouth shut and let the more reasonable people out there make a case for the GOP and conservatism- because you're certainly making no case for it yourself.

You're a gift to the Democratic Party. If I was a DUer, I'd be lifting your quotes straight off this board and using it as an example of how Bush supporters can't handle dissent. It's not true, of course, but you do nothing to prove the assertion false.

Let me be very clear: you just as well BE a self-labeled partisan hack, since you're effectively acting like one.

[JCEccles]

I remember all the two-bit critics carping about Reagan at this stage in his second term as well. I expected to hear that garbage from liberals. But there was a surprising number of erstwhile Republicans who piled on too.

The more things change . . .

[sinkspur]

LOL!! Partisan hack?

Coming from a person who is more than willing to allow the Democrats to take over in the fall?

You have NO interest in enacting conservative policy, to any degree, if you enable Democrats.

And you will enable Democrats if you don't vote for your Republican rep or Senator in the fall.

I've been here a lot longer than you, buddy-boy, and I'll be here after you're gone. I'm not the only one on this thread who smells a rat.

[ex-snook]

I think you struck a nerve. Let's put it this way. The ship of state ship is taking on water, the GOP is rearranging the deck chairs and singing Nearer My God to Thee and the Democrats are pulling away in lifeboats. The President better plug the holes [Nixon's plumber type operation to plug leaks won't help].

[jammer]

Finally got to you, huh? Good--and needed--diatribe. We saw what happened when supporters revolt during the Meir fiasco: things change. But when supporters DON'T revolt, they are just as responsible for the impending losses to Democrats as Bush is. It's not the ones who object, but the Dear Leader worshipping enablers, who are going to be responsible for any losses.