Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration sanctuary idea goes nowhere [San Antonio, Texas]
Express-News Immigration Writer ^ | 05/06/2006 | HernĂ¡n Rozemberg

Posted on 05/07/2006 8:27:45 AM PDT by SwinneySwitch

Should undocumented immigrants feel safely at home in San Antonio?

At least one city leader thinks so, and she'd like her colleagues to back a proposal calling for the city to provide migrants shelter from federal policies meant to boot them out of the country.

Patti Radle, a councilwoman representing District 5 on the West Side, a traditional destination for immigrants, pushed for passage of a resolution denouncing federal legislation clamping down on undocumented migrants and calling for local police to not double as immigration agents.

But Radle was not able to round up a majority of the 11-member council to get the resolution on Thursday's agenda.

She said hers is not a political crusade — she's just trying do her job.

"I'm the granddaughter of an immigrant, and these actions (federal laws and policies) speak against the very root of who we are in San Antonio," Radle said. "They are a direct threat to our constituents, whether they're here legally or not."

The touchy idea grew more controversial after being linked to the concept of San Antonio being a "sanctuary" or "safe haven" city, meaning it would symbolically open its arms to undocumented immigrants and instruct city employees to steer clear of questioning or investigating peoples' immigration status.

Dozens of cities across the country have enacted sanctuary resolutions since the 1980s, but the number of signatories is unknown.

Large cities such as Chicago and Los Angeles passed resolutions last year. In Texas, El Paso passed one last month. Austin adopted a measure in 1997, declaring the city a "safety zone" for immigrants.

The language and tone of most of these symbolic texts — they have no legal bearing because immigration is a federal matter — are similar, particularly those approved this year that target a bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in December.

That measure, which will need to be reconciled with a Senate version before landing on President Bush's desk for final approval, calls for, among other points, making crossing the border illegally a felony and penalizing advocacy groups that aid immigrants.

It would also withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities.

Such criminally oriented changes in immigration law are what prompted Radle to seek her resolution, an effort that immigrant advocates wanted to see extended to include designating San Antonio as a sanctuary city.

"Our city cannot stay silent while we allow immigration (agents) to run rampant," said Jaime Martínez, a longtime civil rights activist who belongs to several local organizations. "We're going to keep going to every council meeting until we get a statement of support."

The move may not pay off, judging from the dearth of support Radle received from her colleagues — only one other council member signed the resolution.

The opposition has a unanimous argument: The City Council is already swamped with work and shouldn't waste taxpayers' time debating matters that have nothing to do with their job description.

Several council members said they personally agree with Radle's politics, but countered that they're against using their jobs as a conduit to espouse personal political views.

"Quite frankly, I applaud Patti's desires and values," said Councilman Kevin Wolff. "But she's mixing business with pleasure."

Councilman Chip Haas offered a solution: Instead of lobbying the council, Radle should pressure her congressman to change immigration laws.

San Antonio is not a sanctuary city, and its leadership has never forbidden city employees, formally or informally, from asking people about their immigration status; nor have workers been told to reject cooperating with federal immigration agents, said J.J. Saulino, a spokesman for the mayor.

Yet the Police Department seems to have a sanctuary-like policy.

"My position is that there's no room for police to enforce immigration laws," said Chief William McManus. "Local police should be concerned with local issues."

McManus' top concern is not letting the immigration issue interfere with the goal of staying close to the community — if people are afraid that by calling police they'll get deported, undocumented immigrants won't report crimes or assist with investigations.

Sometimes officers don't have a choice but to call immigration agents, he said, such as a typical smuggling case in which the driver bails out of a van, leaving behind many people crammed in the back.

Federal immigration agents in San Antonio said they've always had an effective, albeit informal, collaboration agreement with San Antonio police.

"We help them and they help us," said Mike Barón, in charge of the city's Border Patrol station. "Basic professionalism between law enforcement brothers, that's all it is. We'd like to keep it that way."

Although it looks unlikely that San Antonio will join the ranks of sanctuary cities, Radle said she is not quite ready to give up the fight — just the method.

Putting the resolution idea on hiatus, she seems to have heeded Haas' advice: She'll soon send a letter to Texas' congressional delegation, asking them to back immigrant-friendly laws.

Three other council members signed the letter.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hrozemberg@express-news.net


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegals; immigrantlist; pattiradle; sanantonio; sanctuary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: SwinneySwitch

So be it!


21 posted on 05/07/2006 5:27:56 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Immigration: Acting like dupes does not earn us their respect, but their CONTEMPT.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

We all know that ILLEGAL immigration is against the law and your quoting the Constitution brings up an interesting point - why can't enough of us get together and sue our representatives for not enforcing regulations concerning illegal immigrants? Their inaction is threatening the very existence of our country. One possible way to get the Supreme Court involved would be the disenfranchised voter angle - since with many illegals are voting thanks to the motor vehicle registration loophole, they are watering down our votes by not being citizens and voting in our elections.


22 posted on 05/07/2006 7:21:44 PM PDT by Heartland Mom (My heroes have always been cowboys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch

SA, being a military town and having a large Hispanic pop., is a perfect place for illegals to blend in. They have become a 'sanctuary' regardless of the laws.


23 posted on 05/08/2006 4:38:18 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

These sanctuary cities won't hesitate a Mexican minute to whine for federal taxpayer money if/when their local social servce budgets are drained by these "disadvantaged" people.

Some of these cities may already have their hand out, saying "It's a failure of the federal government to secure the border, we deserve to be reimbursed.".


24 posted on 05/08/2006 9:24:41 AM PDT by citizen (Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name! And the White House has a fence around it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Care to go for a ride? Better bring your pistola. ;-)

West Side Neighborhood Profile The area is home to 134,000 residents. Ninety-three percent Latino, the residents are a diverse mix of recent Latino immigrants [codeword for illegals] as well as long-settled families of Mexican origin.

San Antonio’s West Side has been identified as the 11th poorest neighborhood in the nation. The residents most likely to be poor are the children: 44% of them live in families with incomes below the poverty threshold. With a per capita income half the city average, helping West Side families achieve economic success is critical to the work in San Antonio.

Families living in San Antonio’s West Side neighborhoods are larger than average and predominantly stable. While 62 % of them own their own homes, their housing values average less than half of the city total.

There is considerable underemployment and the rate of unemployment is twice that of the city average. The level of educational attainment is also well below that of the city as a whole, with fewer than half of residents age 25 or older having completed high school. One-third of West Side residents have no more than an eighth grade education.

25 posted on 05/08/2006 9:57:05 AM PDT by planekT ([---What a mess.---})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: planekT

I think a shotgun would be more appropriate!


26 posted on 05/08/2006 11:09:26 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Immigration Control and Border Security -The jobs George W. Bush doesn't want to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Mexican minute? Is that like a New York minute?


27 posted on 05/08/2006 11:19:11 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I knew you'd say that. LOL!


28 posted on 05/08/2006 2:52:45 PM PDT by planekT ([---What a mess.---})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: planekT

We all have those particular tools that we're comfortable using.


29 posted on 05/08/2006 3:34:45 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Immigration Control and Border Security -The jobs George W. Bush doesn't want to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rahbert; citizen

No, there's a short siesta in the middle of it.


30 posted on 05/08/2006 3:35:44 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Immigration Control and Border Security -The jobs George W. Bush doesn't want to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

LOL! Thanks for the laugh, I needed it, I just read about the BP tipping off the Mexican government as to where the MM are patroling.


31 posted on 05/09/2006 9:26:31 AM PDT by citizen (Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name! And the White House has a fence around it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: planekT
You want to see what the ILLEGALS have done to San Antonio just look at WILFRED HALL MED CENTER, the ILLEGALS have made it nearly impossible for the thousands of military retirees to get the help they need. Most are being to told to find a civilian facility as WH is over crowded with actives military and indigents.
32 posted on 05/14/2006 3:08:58 PM PDT by snowman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson