Spectacular hyposcrisy on many levels.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: dhuffman@awod.com
Uh oh- I think Harry Potter should contact his lawyer!
To: dhuffman@awod.com
Let's see if I have this right.
A religious creed that maintains it CANNOT be known definitively, but requires an act of FAITH (def. without factual knowledge) now suggests bringing lawsuits to force somebody else to DISPROVE their tenets ??
167 posted on
05/07/2006 8:23:52 PM PDT by
Kellis91789
(I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. --Will Rogers)
To: dhuffman@awod.com
This is one of the fundamental human rights: that we should be respected, our religious beliefs respected Our right to practice religion is protected by the US Constitution.
But that is as far as it goes. There is no right to turn religious sacrilege into legal slander.
All ideas must survive on their own merit.
BUMP
175 posted on
05/08/2006 5:39:37 AM PDT by
capitalist229
(Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
To: dhuffman@awod.com
what is hypocritical about it?
181 posted on
05/08/2006 8:30:14 PM PDT by
Coleus
(I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson