Not only Democrats expect to use a Hayden nomination to revisit the legality of the surveillance, however. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), who has held four hearings on the matter, said he may try to hold up Hayden's confirmation if the administration does not provide more information about the eavesdropping. He said he would try to persuade fellow senators to use the confirmation as "leverage."
1 posted on
05/06/2006 10:12:02 PM PDT by
hipaatwo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; onyx; Txsleuth; mewzilla; Enchante; AliVeritas
2 posted on
05/06/2006 10:14:21 PM PDT by
hipaatwo
To: hipaatwo
WTH..........!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????????
3 posted on
05/06/2006 10:14:23 PM PDT by
goodnesswins
( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
To: hipaatwo; martin_fierro
Bloody shame that they couldn't save his brain when they took out the tumor.
4 posted on
05/06/2006 10:15:00 PM PDT by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
(I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
To: hipaatwo
If Arlene Spectre wants to be a Richard Cranium, go right ahead, senator. Leave the agency without the head, we'll do all of the spy work in at the Pentagon under the watchful eye of someone who is competent.
6 posted on
05/06/2006 10:16:06 PM PDT by
Perdogg
(entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem)
To: hipaatwo
11 posted on
05/06/2006 10:20:21 PM PDT by
p23185
(Being trashed by the Stone Age Press should be worn as a badge of honor by Repubs and Conservatives)
To: ntnychik; devolve; Smartass; PhilDragoo
15 posted on
05/06/2006 10:24:20 PM PDT by
potlatch
(Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
To: hipaatwo
I wouldn't be surprised if one (not THE but one) of the reasons for this choice is to stick it to Specter. Bush helped him get re-elected and is probably regretting it, esp. on the wiretapping stuff.
I also think a fight like this will get Bush's poll numbers up among Republicans.
16 posted on
05/06/2006 10:24:34 PM PDT by
Darkwolf377
(If you flame me I'll ignore you. Assume that to mean I think you're an idiot not worth my time.)
To: hipaatwo
Excellent move by President Bush. Now the hateful democrats and their media will bring back the subject of the NSA and wiretapping of terrorists in the US, and President Bush will have the upper hand again and beat them very hard.
17 posted on
05/06/2006 10:24:55 PM PDT by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: hipaatwo
I have no idea if Specter could be voted out of his chair seat on the Judiciary Committee at this point in time by the other Repubs. If it's possible, I think it would be time to start contacting those other Repubs on the committee to give them an earful on the subject.
20 posted on
05/06/2006 10:27:18 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
To: hipaatwo
He should just make a recess appointment and be done with it.
24 posted on
05/06/2006 10:29:13 PM PDT by
KoRn
To: hipaatwo
I believe Chairman Roberts of the Senate Intell Committee has jurisdiction and NOT the judiciary, regardless of what Specter thinks.
26 posted on
05/06/2006 10:30:15 PM PDT by
Prost1
(Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
To: hipaatwo
It doesn't matter because in 3 weeks the Senate goes on break and he can be recess appointed anyway till Jan. Between November and January all the politicians, Specter Included, should be done pandering to what they think their constituents want and will be ready to confirm him.
27 posted on
05/06/2006 10:30:50 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: hipaatwo
Bush should just "recess appoint" Hayden and get it over with.
The Senate has become a bunch of toddlers sitting in a sandbox playing with cat turds.
To: hipaatwo
With each new day I am more convinced that there is a group of Republican lawmakers that have some sort of interest and agenda in seeing to it that the dems get back in power in the fall.
35 posted on
05/06/2006 10:37:34 PM PDT by
zeaal
(SPREAD TRUTH!)
To: hipaatwo; All
BUMP
for morning. I'm going to go relax. Have a great night all.
36 posted on
05/06/2006 10:38:56 PM PDT by
hipaatwo
To: hipaatwo
screw Arlen, recess appoint Hayden.
37 posted on
05/06/2006 10:40:38 PM PDT by
SCHROLL
(Liberalism isn't a political philosophy - it's a mental illness)
To: hipaatwo
Just damn. hip!
I bet President Bush, and Santorum are kicking themselves everyday for backing Specter in the last election.
Could Specter possibly be more difficult???
Re: Hayden, I think Bush would nominate him now not just because he is the best nominee..but in order to tell Specter just who is POTUS, and who isn't. Hey, Specter, it isn't you!!
NOW, we need Frist to go into Specter's office and tell him that our national security is more important than anything right now...and to get over himself...and stop thwarting Bush at every turn.
39 posted on
05/06/2006 10:44:32 PM PDT by
Txsleuth
To: hipaatwo
"Not only Democrats expect to use a Hayden nomination to revisit the legality of the surveillance, however. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), who has held four hearings on the matter, said he may try to hold up Hayden's confirmation if the administration does not provide more information about the eavesdropping. He said he would try to persuade fellow senators to use the confirmation as "leverage."
===
Specter is disgusting.
40 posted on
05/06/2006 10:45:23 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
To: hipaatwo
"Hayden" you say. Don't know him too well. Any relation to Harriet Miers, perhaps?
44 posted on
05/06/2006 10:55:06 PM PDT by
dr_who_2
To: hipaatwo
"By nominating him, they are looking for a confrontation and forcing the Congress to take sides, so I am troubled by this," said Rep. Jane Harman (Calif.), ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, who has a close relationship with Hayden and considers him "very professional and dedicated."
Right. If nothing else, it'll be entertaining.
50 posted on
05/06/2006 11:26:33 PM PDT by
dr_who_2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson