Replies

"There are significant differences between Angelides?Westly and Arnold."

Unfortunately for Arnold, those are all differences without much of a distinction. It's all a question of how fast you can sprint to the target of a socialist state. Angelides will gt us there the fastest, then Westly and finally Arnold, who prefers cruise control to the target.

" Arnold tried to reduce the power of unions, correct the gerrymandered districts AND control spending with his special election proposisions,..."

We've been over this with you time after time, and it still hasn't sunk in. Probably the result of shift changes at the FO account I would guess. Once more, those propositions failed for a number of very valid reasons: (1) too little, too late; (2) the conservative base didn't trust Arnold then, and even less now; (3) other than some TV ads and a few speeches, Arnold himself did very little to advance the cause; (4) Prop 76 had big problems, as previously enumerated and discussed ad nauseum. That's as much as I have at my fingertips, but we all know the story.

"...which the CA voters defeated. Don't blame Arnold for what the Dem Legislature and the voters did."

And the second that election was over, Arnold immediately launched into a headlong rush to the left. Remember? Sure you do.

Thanks for telling me what I already know about Westly and Angelides. Both of them are unacceptable far left weasels who would normally be considered unelectable but for the fact they are running against another left wing weasel only slightly less reprehensible than the two of them. So now it's a race. Speaking strictly for myself (and a whole bunch of Orange County conservative friends), all three of them are considered unacceptable.

As for your ending two paragraphs attempting to vest Arnold with a few conservative moves, I wonder if you truly recognize how weak, ineffective and unpersuasive your words are?

Pathetic.

"Both of them are unacceptable far left weasels "

But that is exactly what you are going to get, if Arnold gets defeated.

NO sensible person could possibly think that Angelides or Westly woudl be better for CA, than Arnold.

In fact Arnold did as much as ANY Republican/conservative could have achieved under the circumstances. And instead of understanding and appreciating it, by advocating the defeat of Arnold, you are promoting the election of a liberal socialist Dem.

There will be irrevocable damage done to CA, if either Angelides or Westly gets elected.

Using rhetoric that "all three are unacceptable" only tried to make an equivalence between Arnold and the socialist Dems.

First of all there is NO THIRD viable alternative, and second of all, if you could miraculously have a conservative as governor, he couldn't accomplish any more, or even not as much as Arnold has done, given the overwhelmingly Dem Legislature and the voter demographics.

THIS IS THE REALITY. People ignore it at their and our peril.