[calcowgirl]

You are NOT quoting the curernt bond package, but some old potential ones, which are NOT what passed.

Wrong again, FO. I've read the ones that just passed Thursday night and summarized the bill numbers Here. I summarized who voted for what Here. Why not look at this thread, starting at about post #9 and see the millions for retrofitting buses and other NON infrastructure items. Or, go here to see the $135,000,000 in housing for farmworkers, so deceptively written that you have to look up existing code to figure out what pork they have hidden in here. All the posts are linked to the bond packages just passed, which will be on the ballot as Propostitions 1A through 1E.

The liberals trying to pass this garbage, along with the liberal MSM, would love to characterize this as "infrastructure." Thank goodness I can read and understand it for myself as I recommend everyone do.

[FairOpinion]

Your post 42 quoted old, incorrect stuff.

My post 46 quotes the very same numbers, you quoted in the other thread you referred to. So what is the problem?

I had my post where I said this is all for infrastucture (45), pulled by the Mods, because I realized that statement was incorrect.

[goldstategop]

Voters can vote down the pork. And I hope they do so in November although one may be giving too much credit to the intelligence of the average Californian.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")