Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem; ChiMark; Cementjungle; taxesareforever
This is the same vaccine, and I agree with this Lt. Col. who wrote for Soldiers For The Truth:

The 2002 FDA-approved package insert acknowledges both six deaths related to anthrax vaccine and also a wide range of autoimmune disorders.[viii] In November 2005, Newsday reported that FDA has now quietly admitted to 21 deaths.[ix] A wide range of credible media sources have reported these adverse reactions and deaths over many years.

--------------------


Perhaps one general or admiral will finally have the guts to acknowledge
what is now obvious:

that the anthrax vaccine experiment, justified by willful mistruths about
the threat, was morally and ethically wrong;

that the anthrax vaccine experiment, justified by willful mistruths about
the threat, was morally and ethically wrong;

that the on-going cover-up of the deaths and illnesses associated with the
anthrax vaccine is criminal and should be prosecuted under the UCMJ; and,

 that the military leaderships' years of silence and unwillingness to
protect the warriors from the Pentagon's medical bureaucrats has been
cowardly.

Therefore, taking the anthrax vaccine isn't patriotic, or a sign of loyalty
to the chain of command. It is simply aiding and abetting a crime by a
Pentagon leadership, during both the Clinton and Bush Administrations, that
has had no respect for either the law -- or for the soldiers, sailors,
airmen and Marines who serve them.

Those responsible must now be held accountable.

Until there is full accountability, if you are asked to "volunteer" for the
anthrax vaccine, follow former First Lady Nancy Reagan's advice about
illegal drugs: "Just Say No."

John Richardson is a retired USAF Reserve lieutenant colonel, a 1991 Gulf
War veteran, and served as a policy analyst on the Joint Staff (J-5) from
1992-1998.

 

5 posted on 05/06/2006 1:30:53 AM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zipper
wide range of credible media sources

I choke when I see a statement like that.

6 posted on 05/06/2006 1:37:28 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: zipper; taxesareforever; El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; ...
zipper, thanks for the links, especially the Newsday link. The following is from the second page of that story.

Government officials say the rate of serious illness associated with anthrax injections is lower than that for other common vaccines such as influenza, smallpox, tetanus, diphtheria and hepatitis.

About 9 percent of all health problems tied to the BioPort vaccine are considered "serious," compared to 14 percent for the other vaccines combined, said the FDA.

Vaccine Combined With Short-term Postexposure Antibiotics Protects Monkeys From Inhalational Anthrax

As noted by the authors, following the 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, approximately 10,000 people were offered 60 days of antibiotic therapy to prevent inhalational anthrax. Adverse events associated with this regimen--including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness--were commonly reported. More importantly, only about 44 percent of people completed the whole 60-day course. Thus, minimizing the duration of postexposure antibiotic treatment could be crucial to a successful defense against a large-scale anthrax attack.

If I lived in a city with a major league sports team, or I went back in the service, I would take this vaccine in a New York minute. BTW, I was born and grew up in Manhattan. I live a few miles north in the Bronx now.

8 posted on 05/06/2006 9:53:53 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson