[Steve Van Doorn]

"If Rumsfeld has appeared in front of a legal authority (which would be relevant to your reference to the Constitution) then he would be under oath."

You are correct my error. And I agree with you that they have nothing on Rumsfeld except minor differences in phrasing.

[rlmorel]

Actually, I didn't think it was your error...I asked a question which you answered, and you were correct in the application. I suspected some other posters were confusing the issue about whether it applied.

At least that is the way I saw it.