Posted on 05/05/2006 1:54:20 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
Immigration issues are always ripe for demagoguery, particularly in an election year. But the solution to the very real problems along the U.S.-Mexican border can be found, ironically, in that other part of the world that American demagogues love to ridicule: old Europe.
Two years ago, the European Union admitted 10 new nations into their backyard. Like Mexico, all of these nations were poor, some of them fairly backward, corrupt and recently ravaged by war and communist dictatorship.
But the leaders of the European Union wisely created policies for fostering regional economic and political integration that make efforts like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) look timid and halfhearted by comparison.
Europe realized it had to prevent a "giant sucking sound" of businesses and jobs relocating from the 15 wealthier nations to the 10 poorer nations. It also had to foster prosperity and the spread of a middle class in these emerging economies, and prevent an influx of poor workers to the richer nations.
So for starters it gave the new states massive subsidies – billions of dollars – to help construct schools, roads, telecommunications and housing, making these nations more attractive for business investment. The idea was to raise up the emerging economies rather than drag down the advanced economies. It is expensive, but the result has turned out to be a larger economic union in which a rising tide floats all boats.
In return, the 10 poorer nations had to agree to raise their standards on the environment, labor laws, health and safety and more. The incentive of admission to the European club was used as the carrot to the poorer nations for acceptance of human rights and political democracy. There won't be any border maquiladoras in the European Union.
The flow of worker migration still is regulated. Immigrants will be carefully integrated so as to cause the least amount of disruption to the developed economies, with the goal of having open borders within a decade or two.
This bold yet carefully planned EU approach suggests the direction that policy between the U.S. and Mexico should go. Increasingly the demands of the global economy will push the North American regional integration out of the realm of a shadow economy and flawed free trade agreement. But what might such an American-Mexican union look like?
It would start with massive subsidies from the U.S. to Mexico, a Tex-Mex Marshall Plan, with the goal of decreasing disparities on the Mexican side of the border and fostering a climate riper for investment. This would create more jobs in Mexico and foster a middle class, homeownership and better schools, roads and healthcare. Fewer Mexicans would then desire to emigrate north, instead staying home, creating more consumers to buy U.S. products.
But Europe's union is not just an economic one; it also includes continent-wide political institutions for all 25 nations. As American-Mexican economic integration unfolds, regional political structures also make sense to allow better coordination and supervision of the regulatory regime and common goals. Canada, not wishing to be left out, would ask for inclusion.
And here's an even more intriguing possibility. We always assume that opening the border means hordes of Mexicans streaming north, but under this scenario, more Americans also would begin emigrating to Mexico. With the cost of living spiraling along the coasts and in cities, many Americans would find not only the cheaper prices but also the warm climate and palm trees of Mexico a more attractive alternative than relocating to the frigid tundras of South Dakota or Kansas.
Call it the Mexican safety valve, with American workers migrating to Mexico in search of jobs, homeownership, even to start businesses. In other words, they would chase the American dream in Mexico. Already we see the beginnings of this, with American expatriate communities springing up around cities such as Guadalajara.
The Census Bureau predicts that by 2050 the number of Latinos and Asians will triple in the U.S. and whites will make up only 50% of the nation's population. For many people, these changes are alarming, but economic disparities guarantee that poor Mexicans will continue seeking entry into El Norte, legally or illegally.
Given these demographic realities, gradual integration of the American and Mexican economies is the only sensible solution. Of course, U.S. politicians are reluctant to talk about this levelheaded approach, preferring to stick to bumper-sticker slogans and avoid the reality of border issues.
In the meantime, the U.S. is missing out on huge economic opportunities while the European Union has grown to the largest trading bloc in the world, poised for the 21st century. Old Europe is looking spry on its feet, while the U.S. is looking clumsy and stuck to the flypaper of old ideas.
They go to other countries, like Mexico, for summits and discuss everything there. Because these assemblies aren't formally government assemblies, FOI, and public records are not available to the American citizen.
Gee. Nobody intermarries? Isn't that kind of unusual?
Like the Italians, the Portuguese are very industrious but much of their industry is not reported. The GDP figures are bogus for Portugal.
Excuse me...leftest globalists? Uh..we already know there is a globe and we know what your plan is.
Socialism never works.
This from a man who should move to France and wait for his head to be loped off...sheesh.
Leftist and rightist, they all want to establish a supranational government and eliminate national sovereignty.
Actually the ideas candidate George W. Bush had about helping Latin America with economic development were enumerated in speeches he made during the 2000 campaign. So, yes, you were informed that was one of the things he intended to do.
Oh yeah that would be great.
Instead of giving 10 to 12 million more people access to free this that and the other thing, we'll give 80 to 120 million more access to it and just turn the US into a 3rd world pisshole.
(Yes you are right, the problems ARE because these policies are being implemented and our Treasonous elected reps in the District of Criminals know that they would be lynched at home if 90% of the people knew what they were doing.)
If you want to argue that the incorporation of the economies of the Iron Curtain countries into the EU has been a failure, I don't know enough to say otherwise.
But your stating that economic development has failed here is patently false.
The economic ideas that the President has implemented here (like tax cuts) have been successful here.
Our economy is doing much better than when he took office.
And I believe that same set of economic principles could have helped Latin America.
Wow! This guy must read his own newspaper.
The aid wasn't going to go to the governments. It was going to go into small loans to small entrepreneurs to develop small businesses that could keep the entrepreneur employed and hopefully grow and hire others.
By "here" I mean the U.S.A.
We are in this hemisphere. And our GDP is growing nicely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.