Replies

pigdog (post 388): "IOW, wages will increase markedly and prices will increase (with the tax) relative less so allowing benefits to most people."

pigdog (post 400): "Indeed, prices will go down and takehome wages will greatly increase."

pigdog (post 401): "Guess you can't read if you try to spin what I said to mean that prices would increase. I haven't said that at all..."

It's not spin, pigdog, it is all there in black and white. You said it, then you try to re-spin what you said, then you lie about ever saying it. How can you lie about something so plain as day? Dumb question I guess, because you do it all the time. Debating you is pointless, as you have zero intellectual honesty. All you do is get mad and name call.

EITHER BOORTZ IS STUPID, OR THINKS ALL HIS SUPPORTERS ARE

Today on his website Boortz posts the following about the Fair Tax Book 2nd edition paperback:

"Yesterday we got the first numbers for sales of the soft cover edition of The FairTax Book. We debuted as No. 3! Now ... a little historical perspective. In the 1950's Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Weisel's book "Night" debuted as No 1. on the New York Times paperback list. Then in 1966 Truman Capote's "In Cold Blood" debuted as No. 2. Now, in 2006, The FairTax Book debuts as No. 3! This is the highest first week for a paperback in 40 years!"

First of all, I am NOT disputing that FairTax Book will be at #3 on the NYT NONFICTION PAPERBACK book list when the list comes out next week. But the rest of Boortz's over-the-top comparisons are simply flat-out wrong.

First, "Night" by Weisel is #1 on the NYT Nonfiction Paperback book list right now, TODAY, and probably also next week as well. It is the OPRAH book of the moment.

Second, "In True Blood" by Capote is #2 on the NYT Nonfiction Paperback book list right now, TODAY, and probably also next week as well. It is tied in with the movie CAPOTE.

SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/index.html

PAPERBACK NONFICTION (as of May 11 on website)
Top 5 at a Glance
1. NIGHT, by Elie Wiesel
2. IN COLD BLOOD, by Truman Capote
3. THE COVENANT WITH BLACK AMERICA.
4. MY LIFE SO FAR, by Jane Fonda
5. THE TIPPING POINT, by Malcolm Gladwell

So, of course Boortz is confused about whatever the NYT sent him about his book and thinks that his book is #3 highest all-time debut instead of #3 for a singel week, with two books over forty years old ahead of his beloved tome.

He is either stupid or can't read. I am not taking anything away from a #3 debut on any list, even if it is the Non-Fiction Paperback list. But he can't stop there, he needs to claim highest debut in over forty years for a paperback.

Does he even think? Isn't it likely that when the Clinton bios came out in paperback they debuted at #1 on the paperback lists?

There are probably many nonfiction paperback books that came out in the past 40 years that opened at #1 on the paperback list, this is a relatively low-volume list to start with (compared with Fiction numbers).

Why does Boortz have to mis-represent everything?

Hey, rongie - coming from you we always know it's wrong. You've demonstrated that time and again.

All three of those posts are consistent and are saying the same thing but you're too iognorant to realize it. Go back and study what they say. It IS all there in B&W and it all says the same thing only you are unable to grasp the meaning apparently.

To paraphrase a quaint comment that slipped out from a total idjit:

"How can you lie about something so plain as day? Dumb question I guess, because you do it all the time. Debating you is pointless, as you have zero intellectual honesty. All you do is get mad and name call."