To: Prokopton
You have shown that CIS is a group that most FReepers would agree with. Would FReepers agree with Chris Cannon's (R-Utah) assessment of CIS:
According to Cannon, Tanton set up groups like CIS and FAIR to take an analytical approach to immigration from a Republican point of view so that they can give cover to Republicans who oppose immigration for other reasons.
41 posted on
05/05/2006 1:22:37 PM PDT by
sinkspur
( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
To: sinkspur
Republicans who oppose immigration for other reasons.
What other reasons?
43 posted on
05/05/2006 1:25:46 PM PDT by
VOATNOW1
To: sinkspur
so that they can give cover to Republicans who oppose immigration for other reasons.
I've never heard of Republicans who oppose illegal immigration for the other reasons...What are the reasons??? Who are the Republicans???
46 posted on
05/05/2006 1:31:00 PM PDT by
Iscool
(You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
To: sinkspur
"Would FReepers agree with Chris Cannon's (R-Utah) assessment of CIS:
According to Cannon, Tanton set up groups like CIS and FAIR to take an analytical approach to immigration from a Republican point of view so that they can give cover to Republicans who oppose immigration for other reasons.
You mean the RINO Chris Cannon quoted below? No, most Freepers would not agree with him on anything to do with illegal aliens. By quoting liberals, like you have on this thread, you lose all credibility.
At the MALDEF Excellence in Leadership award ceremony, of all places, Cannon said:
We love immigrants in Utah. And we dont often times make the distinction between legal and illegal. In fact, I think Utah was the first state in the country to legislate the ability to get a drivers license based on the matricula consular card and of that I am proud.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson