Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Atlantic Bridge
"Maybe its next members will be Albania, Serbia, Azerbaijan, Georiga or Kazakhstan - uuuh I forgot Turkmenistan (sarcasm). Does anybody really think that the old esprit of NATO can be maintained with nations that have absolutely no cultural and ethnical coherence?"

Ethinical coherence ? Andrew, that's not 30's anymore, really. And there's no reason for sarcasm either.
50 posted on 05/08/2006 9:15:01 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Grzegorz 246
Ethinical coherence ? Andrew, that's not 30's anymore, really. And there's no reason for sarcasm either.

I remember that you reacted quite angry on the suggestion of some other Freepers that your soldiers should go into some certain countries throughout this world (I will not mention any names here ;-)) just to play the world-police. You asked corresponding the logical question: When this is none of our business why should we waste our blood, sweat, tears and... ...money here?

This is the problem of a too exaggerated NATO. Personally I do not see any sense to defend countries or people without any practical benefit as long as they have no real connection to me or my country. I.e. why should conflicts in Africa be of any relevance to Germany or Poland as long as we have no vital interests there? It is understandable to help its neighbours in the case of a conflict but... ...defending a strange, foreign country 7000 miles away?

Therefore I think that NATO is dying if it is overblown. Ah - we did not talk about ethnical coherence: Would you prefer fighting for Pakistan or Australia??!

53 posted on 05/08/2006 3:28:02 PM PDT by Atlantic Bridge (De omnibus dubitandum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson