Put aside she did something you and me, wouldn't, couldn't, but should have done. It took an immigrant to stand up for America's right to verify a vote count.
And you dare chastise her, not for her singular bravery, but rather her perhaps misplaced concern for nature and such.
Shame on you.
Whose arguments aren't--your whole thread isn't self-serving?
Rather than focus on the purpose of this thread, vote counting fraud and more importantly, how to stop the very thing that is at the heart of the Trojan Horse created by politicians lacking any kind of foresight, you dear FRiend, chose to attack the fact that Ms. Landes is an environmentalist.
Please note ONE attack on her.
ONE.
Put aside she did something you and me, wouldn't, couldn't, but should have done. It took an immigrant to stand up for America's right to verify a vote count. And you dare chastise her, not for her singular bravery, but rather her perhaps misplaced concern for nature and such. Shame on you.
Shame on me for posting the credeentials NOT of the woman who is the subject of this article but of the writer of this article?
Shame on you, no friend of the truth, for lying--unless you can show me where I did anything but post this writer's OWN words without ANY words from me.
I guess your outrage at those who don't do things out in the open is highly selective.
And then she wrote about it herself, which makes her Caesar's wife?
Filing a suit and then "reporting" on it oneself--and you have a problem with DIEBOLD not being transparent?
LOL This thread is too much fun to leave alone.
Name one proven - as in prosecuted and convicted - case of voting fraud in the US using the Diebold or Sequoia systems. I am aware of the theoretical possibility, but to my knowledge it is only theoretical and has never been successfully done in a real election.
By contrast, with paper ballots or punch card ballots, fraud was easily committed and from time to time was proven and prosecuted.