Actually NO. I saw Barbara Bush set up when she was asked about whether or not Hillary Clinton was fair game in the 1992 election, with no mention made that Hillary had already said the Clintons were a two for one deal. Laura Bush equally was set up here when she was not told the new translation was not a translation at all but a different song using the music of the US national anthem.
By the way, you don't think her husband, who's fluent in Spanish, might have informed her of the meaning of the words they used?
Never been married have you? Just because someone married a very successful politician does not mean she is a political junky like say the people who post here. The Bush family talks are unlikely to be about which old media landmine might be out there today. They know if the old media had not set her up on this, it would have been another issue. They understand that you can not win with the old media. You on the other hand seem to still be a puppet of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, NYT etc and once again they are pulling your strings.
Then why is she commenting on something that she knows nothing about? It reminds of when she said agreed with reporters that opposition against Harriet Miers was "probably" sexist.
Should she really be giving interviews is she is not familiar with what the President has already discussed?
Then one would wonder what she's doing giving interviews and talking extensively on a subject that's been in the news. She doesn't have to be a political junky in order to know her husband's stated positions on the more prominent issues. I only knew about GWB's statement from watching the TV news. I didn't hear about it on FR or some blog, so it's not like it's some obscure information.