Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueStateDepression
Why? Because he doesn't hold that power. That is for a jury wether it be of civilians or a military tribunal.

The President absolutely has that power. The US Supreme Court in ex parte Quirin approved the use of military tribunals, but also ruled that they were not necessary.

The tribunal proceedings in 1942 were not a trial of any sort. They were not conducted according to the rules for courts martial.

The sole function of the tribunal was to affirm that the individuals to be executed were in fact Germans out of uniform and behind our lines.

In the ZM case, such fact finding was unnecessary.

George W. Bush could absolutely have ordered ZM's execution at any time after 9:03 AM on 9/11/01, solely on his own authority.

That he did not do so is shameful.

1,064 posted on 05/03/2006 3:44:09 PM PDT by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1059 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

I believe a President's role should be one of delegation. Thatmeaning hemakes decisions about how to move forward and then others carry it out. Saddam ordered executions, I do not want that power in the hands of one man, several people yes but not one person.


1,090 posted on 05/03/2006 4:04:39 PM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1064 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson