I note that many arguments employed in defending science education against intelligent design would also apply to defending science education against homosexual design...
It is odd that many leftists opposed to intelligent design support homosexual design and seek to teach all things faithful to the religion of homosexuality YET oppose any religious expression contrary to the homosexual world view...
Why are you trying to change this thread into a gay agenda thread? Would it not be more useful to bring arguments for or against ID to the debate?