ID'rs are not "welcome" to present their findings to science journals.
Just one overview.
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=450
Just one overview.
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=450
If there is one thing that the "Discovery Institute" fears, it is scientific discoveries.
Their PR budget can only stretch so far...
"Because of the controversial nature of your letter to [this journal], and concern about whether it would be appropriate for a scientific journal, I asked a senior [journal] advisor to take a look at your submission. As you will see, the accompanying review identifies many apparent flaws in your arguments, and also questions the basic premise of your arguments, that complex systems cannot be dissected to reveal individual components' roles. I concur with this reviewer's sentiment: complex systems are being unraveled!"
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=450
It appears to me that his letter was refused because of errors in his arguments.
Are you suggesting that standards be suspended to enable poorly constructed arguments to be published?