[Publius6961]

Science which even thinks about "defending itself" from intelligent design can't be much of a science to begin with.

Fortunately, I know only the bottom 5% of so-called scientists have so little to do as to consider this a "pressing issue"...

[Publius6961]

Are there that many gay "scientists"?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Fortunately, I know only the bottom 5% of so-called scientists have so little to do as to consider this a "pressing issue"..."

"Are there that many gay "scientists"?"

Actually, the 5% figure corresponds to the percentage of scientists in all fields who reject evolution. Very interesting...

[gondramB]

>>Science which even thinks about "defending itself" from intelligent design can't be much of a science to begin with.<<

You think that it wrong for an academic area that is vital to the country to object when people try to make them teach something with no basis that can be observed?

Would the military object if non-military tried to force them to teach military theory based on biblical strategy?

Would air traffic controllers object to laymen forcing them to teach in way they felt would compromise air safety?

Would medical schools object to being forced to teach medicine based on religion without evidence?

I submit that science would be foolish to no object - and frankly so should anyone who cares about the country or the future of Christianity.