"You would deduce from "Gabz"'s line of though that children would be healthier if they had a tobacco smoke producing machine in their bedroom."
Her comments say no such thing, but don't hesitate to continue down your decietful path. BTW, when you talk about another FReeper, it is polite to ping them to the comments.
"Her comments say no such thing, but don't hesitate to continue down your decietful path."
I don't think they're going to get that message. It doesn't fit into the agenda.
------------------------------------------------------------
Every sickly kid I know comes from a household where they are not permitted to get dirty, anti-bacterial soaps and wipes are used constantly, and are all non-smoking households. All the healthy kids I know are allowed to be kids - they play outside, they get dirty, they've been known to even eat dirt and many live in non-smoking households, but others live in households with smokers, or are around friends and relatives that are smokers. (Gabz)(highlighting mine)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Let me explain my power of deduction: Our friend, Gabz seems to believe that children from homes where parents, friends and relatives smoke are healthier than children from homes without smoke. (gasp) I deduce that (if what she says is true) then, children would be healthier if they had a device in their bedroom that would provide those young lungs with the nutritional benefits of tobacco smoke.
What do you think?
I must add one caveat - I do feel that both of you are very good people and any disagreement we have in forum is just that and doesn't mean that I do not like you.
My dad was a smoker who died at the age of 55 of heart failure with his lunch packed away in the refrigerator for the next day.
Thanks my friend........I've been away all day and am just getting back here - I hope to find that the dork has mendit's s/h/it's ways.
The anti-smoekrs would have totally FREAKED out at the seafood festival we attended today.........more than 75% of the folks there were tobacco users..........and I'm only talking about the 3,200 people who paid to attend, not the several 100s of folks working there.