[Mrs. Don-o]

"It's clear that [Randall Terry's] sadness and embarrassment aren't just from Jamiel's "being gay," but from the fact that Jamiel sold an interview to Out Magazine which included pictues of the Terry family."

Terry's embarrassment had nothing to do with any invasion of privacy concerns, but the embarrasment of having a homosexual son who came out. He wrote an opinion piece entitled "My Son, the Homosexual". Randall Terry had always campaigned against homosexuals, and could not take this public knowledge of a homosexual in his very own family. Real love, huh?

OK. I looked up the article you referenced (titled "My Prodigal Son, the Homosexual") which is at:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37979

It strongly confirms what I wrote above. Terry repeatedly affirms his love and care for Jamiel, together with his anger and hurt over the Out Magazine episode.

[MACVSOG68]

it strongly confirms what I wrote above. Terry repeatedly affirms his love and care for Jamiel, together with his anger and hurt over the Out Magazine episode.

The interview Terry gave attempted to demonstrate that he was a loving parent and anything that happened to his son must have happened before he took him in. He calls his son's story filled with fraud and deceit and says he is no longer welcome in his home. Did you read the interview given by his son? His son had nothing but compliments for his father.

Randall Terry is an admitted fraud, and this obviously embarrassed him beyond belief, given his anti-gay activities. As I said earlier, I will go with the Vice-President's reaction, and if one of my children were gay (which they are not), I would hope my response would be that of Mr. Cheney's. I think God understands love over hate any day of the week.