Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spanalot
The problem is this

Ethanol conversion is 30% efficient, and to run cars on pure ethanol will require engine modification.In newer cars it means the computer chip. 3-$500. Without subsidies it costs about $80/barrel equiv.

A better technology is Thermochemical Conversion, it is 80% efficient, and will also handle most of this country's solid waste problems. The problem is, that it creates oil at an unsubsidized cost of $80/barrel. Thus, it will compete directly with cheep middle eastern oil. (All they would have to do is drop their price and we are skewered.)

Therefore ethanol is a better short term solution, since it gets our basic transportation costs out of the hands of foreign oil. Caveat: Ethanol/Gasoline blends are a waste of time, since they compete with oil, and for that, they are way too expensive.

7 posted on 05/02/2006 12:19:18 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: D Rider

" The problem is, that it creates oil at an unsubsidized cost of $80/barrel."
For transporation fuel, we have all we need for the next 100 years in Canada and Colorado for $20/ barrel cost.

Let's invade Canada instead of Iran.


15 posted on 05/02/2006 1:13:39 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson