Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
The Massachusetts court is violating the U.S. Constitution and the Reynolds decision. If they had a governor with some filberts, and Congress would get up off their duffers, this would not be an issue.

But they won't get off their duffers and will not enforce the law of the land and will not impeach judges who over-reach their lawful duties.

Should this be an issue? No.

Do I trust Congress and judges to enforce the law and uphold the constitution? No.

Is an amendment to the US Constitution necessary to control an out of control judicial branch and a spineless congress? I believe yes.

145 posted on 05/03/2006 6:50:15 PM PDT by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: dpa5923
Is an amendment to the US Constitution necessary to control an out of control judicial branch and a spineless congress? I believe yes.

I think such an Amendment should also include “civil unions,” “domestic partners,” etc., etc.,... or anything remotely resembling monogamous heterosexual marriages the left can fish out of the sewer.

It is rumored Rev. Al Sharpton will wed 1000 homosexuals at the next DNC national convention and 500 portable public toilets are reserved for honeymoon suites...

147 posted on 05/03/2006 8:31:07 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson