Posted on 04/30/2006 6:51:38 AM PDT by ncountylee
No solutions, information, discussion or debate.
Just "This is sad".
Sad, isn't it?
No, a warranty is a liability and the point of a bankruptcy is to shed liabilities. When Wards went bankrupt, I lost the last 4 of 5 oil changes I'd bought as a package. No oil changes and no refund either.
Yes, the government will probably go bankrupt in order to bail out GM.
I suspect they are all too integrated on the manufacturing, and design, side to do that. But Chevy and Cadillac might manage it, since the top and the bottom of the line share less than the ones in the middle.
I'd say it's probably too late for those institutions as well, the rot is too widespread.
Then take a lot at the % US (and Canada) content on your next vehicle. "Japanese" brands often have as much, or more, US content than GM and Ford. If you buy MoPar, your money is going to Germany, in the same way it goes to Japan if you buy Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mazda, etc. (Mazda's are often built in Ford plants, since Ford owns a major fraction of Mazda)
If only that were true. We will pay for GM whether we want to or not. GM can dump its pension in bankruptcy on the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. And once GM goes Ford will follow and dump its pension and then the PBGC will have to be bailed out by the Federal Government.
It's our own fault we let the airlines play in this bankruptcy game far too long now we will reap the benefits as other major industries follow suit.
Not a direct line between the two. Folks are missing the most important connection between them: government.
The Wagner Act, along with New Deal and post-WWII price controls consolidated the Big Three dominance -- and at the same time killed, most violently, the vibrant independent mfgs. It bought a few decades of shareholder value in GM, Ford and Chrysler, but the decline and disappearance of the independents has proved fatal for Detroit.
Think of it this way:
Studebaker = Honda.
Nash = Mazda
Packard = Nissan
Hudson = Toyota
Kennedy killed in 1975?
"I used to work at NASA years ago. Every now and then someone would show off thier new Japanese car. I would always ask them "How are the people in Detroit going to pay your salary if you won't buy thier cars?". "
So an overpaid union employee needs to exist to fund an overpaid gov't powerpoint engineer at NASA?
The all but dead space shuttle program is a perfect parallel to GM. Instead of focusing on what the need is, focus on the salaries and pensions of the employees.
American innovation, when focused on solving a problem is unbeatable. When distracted with peripheral issues of bureaucracy, or union benefits we couldn't suck more.
Exhibit A - GM
Exhibit B - Space Shuttle
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.