[FairOpinion]

"Having said that, in the last year I have begun representing applicants (injured workers) in my semi-retirement. I arrived in this area of practice just in time for the California reforms to take effect. (Timing never has been my long suit.) What I have seen depresses "


You are quoting from a personal injury lawyer!

[NormsRevenge]

and therefore, he has no right to speak as a result, unless he donates to the GOP and even then, he'll get slapped down by the likes of you and those who seek to tell people to just accept what they are told and fed awithout question.

How conservative of you.. Uh,, btw, more than a few now driving the GOP rush for the cliff's edge are high powered legal types and lawyers, should that get them a free pass based on that?

You really revel dealing in the politics of personal destruction and character assassination thru innuendo and out and out lying?

How telling.

[Maven]

You are quoting from a personal injury lawyer!

I must have missed it - where did it say he was a personal injury attorney? The two areas are quite separate - although there can be some overlap if the injured worker has a third party claim, in which case, the employer's carrier can look to obtain credits for any judgments against the third party.

No, I'm not a lawyer - just a legal assistant who works for a law firm specializing in workers' compensation applicant law, with an emphasis on law enforcement and firefighter clientele.

In California, workers' compensation cases are dealt with at the Workers Compensation Appeals Boards, which are separate from the state court system.

Maven