Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl

"the big-spend, big-borrow, pro-gun-control, pro-GLBT, pro-abort, liberal judicial appointments, big-green agenda "

===

There you go again, MISREPRESENTING Arnold's positions.

Arnold VETOED the homosexual marriage bill, he vetoed the drivers licenses for illegals bill, he promoted Prop. 76, to reign in spending (which YOU voted AGAINST), he appointed over 50% Republican judges, his environmental agenda is based on voluntary cooperation, instead of mandatory one, as that of the Democrats, Arnold also prevented the Dems from raising taxes.

Both Angelides and Westly are on record saying that they WILL SIGN a bill giving drivers licenses to illegals, WILL SIGN a bill for homosexual marriage, WILL sign a bill to make environmental compliance mandatory, both are FOR raising taxes, and increasing spending "for the children".

So let's see, which is more in line with conservative principles, Arnold or the Dems.

It's pretty clear.

So why are you still advocating voting AGAINST Arnold, which WILL RESULT in a DEM getting elected with the above platform?


36 posted on 04/30/2006 12:03:20 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
There you go again, MISREPRESENTING Arnold's positions.

ROFL! Your blind allegiance is predictable, but you fail to acknowledge the facts.

Arnold VETOED the homosexual marriage bill, he vetoed the drivers licenses for illegals bill,

He passed the most progressive GLBT legislation this state has seen with special rights for gays in property taxes, pensions and other--and of course the Unruh Civil Rights Bill. Who needs marriage when they get all the special rights anyway?

he promoted Prop. 76, to reign in spending (which YOU voted AGAINST),

It did not reign in spending -- it authorized even MORE borrowing.

he appointed over 50% Republican judges

When 80-90% is the normal expectation, I wouldn't tout this as a plus, FO. More GLBTers on the bench, along with Villaraigosa's sister, personal injury lawyers, defense attorneys, etc.

his environmental agenda is based on voluntary cooperation, instead of mandatory one, as that of the Democrats, Arnold also prevented the Dems from raising taxes.

That is laughable! His $3 Billion dollar solar roofs plan is voluntary? How about those hydrogen highways? You mean I won't have to pay taxes or fees on my power bill to subsidize this cr@p? His program for global warming is not voluntary--it is moving to a cap and trade program with his "voluntary" guidelines being a basis for new legislation.

So why are you still advocating voting AGAINST Arnold...

I am not advocating against Arnold. I am advocating FOR the Republican platform and Conservatism. I believe that elected representatives should be held accountable to the platform on which they ran and the party to which they chose to associate themselves with. When they act like a liberal and govern like a democrat, I will speak out. If Republicans don't hold their politicians accountable, who will, the Democrats? I think not.

37 posted on 04/30/2006 12:26:07 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson