Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

I guess one reason why British troops were not involved in the suppression of the AlSadr uprising in 2003. Even though the British were closer to the scene, a task force had to be formed from our troops in Baghdad.


38 posted on 04/29/2006 8:14:12 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

You are badly misinformed regarding the Al-Sadr uprising or you are forgetting that the uprising took place not just in US areas but across Iraq.

Sorry,Robby,but AlSadr's attacks came also against we British...

5th Aug 2004: Militants linked to the firebrand cleric Moqtada al-Sadr declared holy war on British forces(in Basra, British forces had arrested four Sadr supporters on 3 Aug)

5th to 12th August 2004:

British troops fight fierce battles with militants in Amara and Basra.
British troops launched an offensive overnight on Tuesday [10 Aug.] against Shia fighters in the southern town of Amara, killing 10 of them.

'The purpose was to regain control of al-Amarah,' said Squadron Leader Spike Wilson, British forces spokesperson. 'Control is what it's all about.'

--('British troops kill 10', The Times, 12 Aug.)


72 posted on 04/30/2006 2:54:18 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson