To: SauronOfMordor
But what is listed is their plan is their intent to attack U.S. Embassies which are legally U.S. territory located in a foreign nation. Therefore, an attack on the sovereign territory of The United States.
60 posted on
04/29/2006 12:34:40 PM PDT by
navyblue
To: navyblue
But what is listed is their plan is their intent to attack U.S. Embassies which are legally U.S. territory located in a foreign nation. Therefore, an attack on the sovereign territory of The United States.
Didn't stop them before.
The Carter response only legitimized their action.
62 posted on
04/29/2006 12:36:38 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: navyblue
But what is listed is their plan is their intent to attack U.S. Embassies which are legally U.S. territory located in a foreign nation. Therefore, an attack on the sovereign territory of The United States. While legally the same thing, it is not the same thing in the practical world. Remember the Iranians attacked the US Embassy and took our people prisoner during Jimmy Carter's term
70 posted on
04/29/2006 1:13:13 PM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson