Let's see Hillary said that the nuclear option should be off the table. The current administration says it should be on the table.
Hillary's husband was president for 8 years and did nothing about terrorism. This administration's actions against terrorism are many.
Yet your eyes get all misty with the anticipation that Hillary or a Democrat will make Iran a smoking ember.
I've really got to get out of here.
Hillary would be more likely to nuke some heavily conservative state, blame it on the VRWC, and declare war on anyone politically to the right of her own hindness, than she would be to oppose terrorism.
Remember how they practically tried to brand the NRA as a domestic terrorist organization?
This Iranian (and Islamic) posturing reminds me of the deception the Nazis used while building their military, when Europe was busy trying to appease them. By the time the lights went on the Nazis were as strong as they had portrayed.
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
I'm not a Democrat.......I'm speculating on a long shot.
With their recent track record of defeatism, a pragmatic Democrat would have to establish early a tough stance on self defense!
After all...even Democrats have kids.....and THEY are the ones concentrated in the cities where future potential terrorist events might occur!
I believe Joe Lieberman could win in 2008 if he could get through the primaries......
and if he formed a new party and ran as an independent.....there's a chance he could win.