To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
"If a Democrat wins the presidency in 2008, Iran will become a smoking ember!!"
That is saracasm, right?
To: butternut_squash_bisque
That is saracasm, right?Nope!
My explanation is clear.
However, if the problem has been cleaned up by 2009, then things might be different.
17 posted on
04/29/2006 10:36:16 AM PDT by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(I'm a proud GRINGO......is Bill Clinton still the president?...Seems that way!)
To: butternut_squash_bisque
Heh... I don't think so.
It would be a crazy 'mouse trap' way of doing it, and I think Iran will be 'solved' one way or the other before 2008.
Though a president facing the OBVIOUS and OVERT threat, without the media on his(or her, heh) back for every little thing would almost HAVE to act.
Add in the democrats (properly) percieved weakness in National Security, PLUS if it was... a her... that would just be too much.
Iran would be a cinder.
Though, like I said, I'm sure we can come up with a much better plan that is much more within our control than that 'roadrunner' approach.
30 posted on
04/29/2006 10:57:10 AM PDT by
FreedomNeocon
(I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
To: butternut_squash_bisque
That is saracasm, right? Not really a Democrat would have to look tough to keep it's 'street creds'. Look at the idiotic actions taken by Clinton.
47 posted on
04/29/2006 11:59:15 AM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Proud soldier in the American Army of Occupation..)
To: butternut_squash_bisque
No its not. Democrats are only peaceniks when they are the minority. When they are in power they love to bomb third world nations and start wars. WW1 WW1 Korea and Vietnam were all started by Democrats. CLinton bombed the hell out of anyone after he got caught literally with his pants at his anckles. To them war is politics.
67 posted on
04/29/2006 1:02:13 PM PDT by
RHINO369
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson