Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Set to Approve Takeover of 9 Military Plants by Dubai
NY Times ^ | April 28, 2006 | JIM RUTENBERG and DAVID E. SANGER

Posted on 04/28/2006 4:32:20 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last
To: TexasTransplant
Why can't we take on the tough issues of ANWR, Drilling off of California, Florida, Nuclear Plants and Utah's low sulfur coal?

I agree --- I certainly would rather see a political fight on energy grounds in an election year.

While there will be some strong opposition from the far left to developing our energy resources, it will be solely from the left. These other items, where the debate is over national security matters, will tend to divert critical support from the base in a critical election season. It's just not politically wise.

41 posted on 04/28/2006 5:12:26 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
I wasn't against the ports deal, but I was highly distressed by the political gains made by the Democrats due to it.

That's the only reason Schumer made it an issue, and he played the GOP Congress (Duncan Hunter being exhibit A) for fools.

42 posted on 04/28/2006 5:12:52 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

How about the World Trade Center?




Er, Oh never mind.


43 posted on 04/28/2006 5:14:35 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Sorry, I think Japan can claim squatter's rights there. Isn't the Pearl O-club their 19th Hole?


44 posted on 04/28/2006 5:16:20 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit
I saw this article, this morning.
The comedy just doesn't stop...
45 posted on 04/28/2006 5:17:03 PM PDT by Smartass (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369
He came out and said he had no idea what was going on, then blasted republicans for being racist.

He's not supposed to get involved in the initial approval process; CFIUS has to finish its review first.

And the Republicans WERE racist. They had no valid reasons for spitting on a country that has serviced our Navy's ships for four years, so they tried to make the UAE out to be a haven for terrorists.

It was the most shameful display of xenophobia I've ever witnessed in an elected body.

46 posted on 04/28/2006 5:18:10 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NAVY84

We're friendly with Japan and we only sell out to people who want to screw us.


47 posted on 04/28/2006 5:18:27 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What's the problem?


48 posted on 04/28/2006 5:19:16 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Actually, they aren't giving the Palestinians $$ because of America. The Hamas government is nearly bankrupt, and the foreign minister actually got $$ stolen from him in a hotel in Kuwait City when he was going around to Arab capitals unsuccessfully convincing them to pony up.
49 posted on 04/28/2006 5:20:19 PM PDT by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

"Some of you people are such media dupes."

Agreed. Yeesh.


50 posted on 04/28/2006 5:22:56 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Accygirl

Actually I believe they are giving money to the palestinians eith on or off the books. In any case, I for one am not happy arming the animals killing our soldiers.


51 posted on 04/28/2006 5:24:13 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Czar

I'm more concerned about our cousins across the pond. What else (beside Buckingham Palace and Big Ben) do they have left? He!! the London Freakin' Bridge is in Arizona! The Arabs own most everything else over there.


52 posted on 04/28/2006 5:26:04 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
>>>>"I agree --- I certainly would rather see a political fight on energy grounds in an election year"<<<<<

And in all of the fights I have ever been in, not "one" (or "any number" for those Clinton parsing types), not at any time did I ever start trying to figure my odds, I was there to Fight, not fanangle!

If it's worth fighting for "take the risk, engage and WIN"

TT
53 posted on 04/28/2006 5:29:54 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

Well... Considering that the invasion of Iraq was launched from Qatar and Kuwait and that the U.S. Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain, I believe that the governments of the Gulf States are our allies. Of course, this alliance comes out of enlightened self-interest. The Gulf States emirs have a very liberal view of Islam that doesn't jive with Osama and friends' vision of the Arab world and understand that they're Osama's next target. Helping America out protects them from external and internal enemies. (Think the first Gulf War).


54 posted on 04/28/2006 5:32:50 PM PDT by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
A. The only people who resemble hyenas are you relentless Bush sycophants.

B. It's better to be a hyena than a lobotomized elephant.

C. The Conn. congressional delegation has been speaking out against this idiotic deal from Day one, as well as almost every other legitimate conservative activist and radio talk show host.

Andrew Wilcow has been excoriating this strategic blunder for weeks, if not months.

55 posted on 04/28/2006 5:38:01 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

I didn't say he should have known about it, it was a two bit deal. However to say he had no idea what was going on gave teh democrats all the power. Like I said I only had a problem with how he played it politcally, for such a small deal, he had nothing to gain and everything to lose supporting it. He chose poorly.


56 posted on 04/28/2006 5:41:34 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

"Can you guys think of anything else we can give away?"

He could give the drug cartels and human smugglers 500 yards along our side of the mexican border. Imminent domain and all that, it's for the common welfare. /sarc


57 posted on 04/28/2006 5:42:15 PM PDT by theymakemesick (Sept 11th was perpetrated by GOOD MUSLIMS www.prophetofdoom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
The Conn. congressional delegation has been speaking out against this idiotic deal from Day one, as well as almost every other legitimate conservative activist and radio talk show host.

The Connecticut congressional delegation? All three of them?

I haven't heard a peep out of the usual suspects: Malkin, Ingraham, Hannity. I did read that Savage is pissed that Schumer didn't come on his show and raise hell.

He doesn't realize that Schumer played him for a putz.

58 posted on 04/28/2006 5:44:40 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Five.

Each congressional district contains over half a million people, give or take a few thousand.

I see that you need to brush up on your math skills as well.

59 posted on 04/28/2006 5:50:36 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Each congressional district contains over half a million people, give or take a few thousand.

625,000, to be exact.

We've got five congressional districts in Dallas and its suburbs.

60 posted on 04/28/2006 5:56:32 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson