Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shell unveils plans for 'biggest refinery in US'( Largest and First since 1972)
Breitbart /AFP ^ | Apr 28 11:03 AM US/Eastern

Posted on 04/28/2006 11:08:37 AM PDT by IrishMike

Anglo-Dutch oil group Royal Dutch Shell has announced plans to make its jointly owned Motiva refinery in Port Arthur, Texas, the biggest in the United States.

Shell founded the Motiva refiniery in 1998 with Saudi Refining and is considering increasing the output at the facility by 325,000 barrels per day.

"The project would make the Port Arthur Refinery the largest in the country," Shell said in a statement on Friday.

Output would rise to 610,000 barrels per day, higher than the 557,000 barrels per day produced by the ExxonMobil facility in Baytown, Texas, the current biggest in the country.

"Pending necessary regulatory approvals, Motiva would expect to initiate final engineering later in 2006 and begin construction in 2007," said Shell, while underlining that a final decision to expand the facility had not been taken.

"The new capacity would be projected to come online in 2010."

A shortage of refining capacity worldwide has been identified as one of the reasons behind the recent surge in crude oil prices. Oil companies have been accused of failing to invest adequately in new facilities.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bigoil; energy; gas; gasprices; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2006 11:08:41 AM PDT by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

It's about time somebody got the ball rolling on this.


2 posted on 04/28/2006 11:09:35 AM PDT by Graycliff (Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Slap those enviro-nazi's right upside the head and build this thing!!!!!!! We need it!!!!! Next stop, ANWR.....


3 posted on 04/28/2006 11:10:02 AM PDT by joe fonebone (When did being white, christian and conservative become a criminal offense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

It's about GD time...sheesh!


Build three of the damn things.


4 posted on 04/28/2006 11:10:50 AM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

It's a good start.


5 posted on 04/28/2006 11:10:58 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Every one of these oil companies should use this opportunity to build refineries and storage facilities.

Build one next door to Kerry and Kennedy, just for S's and G's


6 posted on 04/28/2006 11:11:20 AM PDT by hattend (Gotta turn up the heat on the damn melting pot. Some stuff looks like it doesn't want to melt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Excellent news!
Thanks for posting it, Mike!

Hopefully, this is just a start!


7 posted on 04/28/2006 11:11:45 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Shell's price are the highest of all stations in my area.


8 posted on 04/28/2006 11:12:33 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Shell founded the Motiva refiniery in 1998 with Saudi Refining and is considering increasing the output at the facility by 325,000 barrels per day.

..but,but,but...doesn't this mean the Saudi's own a refinery in the US? How come the politico's aren't acting like a bunch of monkeys in a banana famine over this...??

Doogle

9 posted on 04/28/2006 11:12:59 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF ...8thTFW...408MMS..Ubon ,Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery ..AMMO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
"The new capacity would be projected to come online in 2010."

I'll believe it when I see it, probably take that long to get clearance from the EPA because they found some rare salamander hanging around.

10 posted on 04/28/2006 11:13:30 AM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
"Pending necessary regulatory approvals,

If this refinery were anywhere but Texas, those four words would be a stake to the heart.

11 posted on 04/28/2006 11:13:33 AM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Oil companies have been accused of failing to invest adequately in new facilities

The watermelon jihadist enviros have nothing to do with it.

12 posted on 04/28/2006 11:13:42 AM PDT by hattend (Gotta turn up the heat on the damn melting pot. Some stuff looks like it doesn't want to melt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
Slap those enviro-nazi's right upside the head and build this thing!!!!!!! We need it!!!!! Next stop, ANWR.....

Yes, screw them. Them punks have worn out there welcome.

13 posted on 04/28/2006 11:14:06 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

It's good news, for certain, but it's a refinery expansion, not a new refinery.


14 posted on 04/28/2006 11:14:51 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
I notice the story doesn't give a cost estimate, which would have to be in the billions. Gee, don't suppose the company's going to use some of its (gasp) profits to pay for this...?
15 posted on 04/28/2006 11:15:03 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Is it a good idea to have them all in the same place though? Why can't we have refineries in Wyoming or someplace where there is very little chance of a major disruption? I know there were refineries there at one time.


16 posted on 04/28/2006 11:15:09 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

This isn't a new refinery. It is an expansion of an existing refinery. A lot less regulatory hurdles to overcome. The environmentalists block on new refineries is still effective.


17 posted on 04/28/2006 11:15:35 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Looks like they are fixin to open a new cat cracker.


18 posted on 04/28/2006 11:15:43 AM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Here comes the lawsuits. There is a gas line that was proposed to run from New Mexico to Arizona and the lawsuits started to fly and, the pipeline still has not been built.

The lawsutes started in the 1980's.


19 posted on 04/28/2006 11:16:50 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
It's a good start.

Indeed. But it won't be running at full capacity for many years.

20 posted on 04/28/2006 11:17:32 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I can't complain...but sometimes I still do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson