Skip to comments.
Dhimmi-nized:
Scared Westerners single out one religion for kid-gloves treatment
WORLD ^
| 5/6/06
| Gene Edward Veith
Posted on 04/28/2006 10:45:25 AM PDT by Caleb1411
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
04/28/2006 10:45:28 AM PDT
by
Caleb1411
To: Caleb1411
Dear Editor (never published):
"Muslim Spain was a perfect example of a flourishing society in which Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in mutual respect and cooperation."
Muslim Spain was Christian Spain for nearly 700 years before being conquered by Islamic Armies in the 8th Century. That is the way the Islamic Religion has been historically spread, though military invasion and occupation. Treatment of conquered people has the same goal, the minimizing of other religions and conversion of the indigenous people. Among other rules for non Muslims in Muslim Spain; Christians and Jews could not bear arms -- Muslims could; Christians and Jews could not ride horses -- Muslims could; Christians and Jews had to get permission to build or fix places or worship -- Muslims did not; Christians and Jews had to pay certain taxes which Muslims did not; Christians could not proselytize -- Muslims could; Christians and Jews had to bow to their Muslim masters; Christians and Jews had to live under the laws set forth in the Koran, not under either their own religious or secular law; Christians and Jew's word in a court of law was not equal to a Muslim's Word; Christian and Jewish families had to give up a son for conversion and military service in Muslim armies and the most beautiful and largest Christian Churches were converted to Mosques. And the list goes on.
Today, 1300 years later, a Christian or Jew living in an Islamic country will still have to live nearly under these very same laws. I can see why the head of the Philadelphia chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations would want us all to do "our part" to create such a world.
Regards,
2banana
2
posted on
04/28/2006 10:49:11 AM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: 2banana
Muslim Spain was Christian Spain for nearly 700 years before being conquered by Islamic Armies in the 8th Century. Er, it's probably a bad idea to start with an obvious error (Spain, like the rest of the Roman Empire, was not "Christian" until the time of Constantine, about 400 years before the Arab conquests).
3
posted on
04/28/2006 10:55:45 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: EveningStar
To: steve-b; 2banana
...Spain, like the rest of the Roman Empire, was not "Christian" until the time of Constantine...So you are asserting that there was no substantial Christian population in Spain until Constantine?
5
posted on
04/28/2006 11:13:11 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
("...the past ten years in Kosovo will be replayed here in what some call Aztlan.")
To: Caleb1411
Hey.. its not a great idea to bag on ANY religion, so I dont know why such a big deal is being made about this.
Is it now the thing that you have to mock peoples religion to prove your credentials?
Theyre not being so dumb after all these cartoonists... they just skip making fun of the religion where people get riled up enough about jokes to blow you up.
On the other hand, I get pretty mad when people make fun of MY religion. Even madder when noone says anything about it, like we're all just supposed to take it.
6
posted on
04/28/2006 11:16:33 AM PDT
by
ketelone
To: ketelone
Note, I didnt say that blowing people up for making cartoons is the appropriate response...
But I do think that atheism in the media has reached such a crescendo that they feel they should have the right to amuse themselves with cheap sophomoric pranks at the expense of religion.
South park itself offends freely as you know.. Moses is reduced to a glowing light, which talks like a computer, Jesus is turned into a swearing hippy...
I just dont like it. Still, of course violence isnt the answer..
7
posted on
04/28/2006 11:19:27 AM PDT
by
ketelone
To: ketelone
I think you may be missing the point of the article, which is the double-standard in response to threats of violence. That just rewards the violent, and encourages them further.
8
posted on
04/28/2006 11:21:59 AM PDT
by
inquest
(If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
To: inquest
Yeah, sorry, knee jerk reaction. I totally agree with the part about there shouldnt be selective pandering.
9
posted on
04/28/2006 11:27:42 AM PDT
by
ketelone
To: Caleb1411
10
posted on
04/28/2006 11:29:46 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Why did Allah create free will and then demand submission? Wouldn't robots have been easier?)
To: Caleb1411
.
They knew they had nothing to fear from offending Christians, but that Muslims really might kill them.
.
11
posted on
04/28/2006 11:31:09 AM PDT
by
Thrusher
("...there is no peace without victory.")
To: Caleb1411
"Canada has taken the extraordinary step of allowing Muslims in that country to be governed by Islamic law (Shariah) when it comes to disputes over property and family issues, including marriage and divorce."
This is wrong, wrong, and wrong.
Ontario -- one province, not the whole country -- almost allowed for Imams to conduct family law arbitrations using Shariah law. The courts would still have had oversight, and final determination. Almost happened -- it didn't actually happen.
It was a fun debate to watch -- I almost expected the heads of soft lefties to begin exploding. Their thought (or emoting) process went something like this:
"Our strength is diversity, all cultures are equal, we must allow this in the name of multiculturalism and group rights."
"Women's rights must be protected and advanced at all costs. Shariah would set women's rights back at least 700 years. We can't allow this to happen in the name of women's rights."
Repeat in an endless loop until head explodes.
In this case, feminism trumped multiculturalism. The issue was resolved by proscribing Jewish and Christian arbitrations, along with the Shariah-based arbitrations.
To: Caleb1411
"Canada has taken the extraordinary step of allowing Muslims in that country to be governed by Islamic law (Shariah) when it comes to disputes over property and family issues, including marriage and divorce."
NO, IT HAS NOT!
How many times does that have to be repeated? One province, Ontario, was considering allowing a place for it in civil disputes. The decision was made, after some strong protests from a number of groups including some Muslim groups, not to go ahead with this (stupid, IMO) idea.
13
posted on
04/28/2006 11:33:16 AM PDT
by
-YYZ-
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Looks like you beat be to the punch.
Cheers.
14
posted on
04/28/2006 11:34:36 AM PDT
by
-YYZ-
To: -YYZ-
At least we're punching the same thing. :-)
To: Caleb1411
16
posted on
04/28/2006 11:55:26 AM PDT
by
PsyOp
(The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
To: Caleb1411
"We're going to have to fight the bastards sooner or later? Why not do it now while we have the army to do it with?" -- GEN George S. Patton, 1945, referring to the USSR
To: Caleb1411
" They knew they had nothing to fear from offending Christians, but that Muslims really might kill them. "
No kidding....
Islam instructs its followers to kill their enemies.
The Quran says to "fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them"(Surah 9:5)
This is what the Muslems are taught to do to the people that resist Islam according to the Quran:
Fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them and seize them, beleager them and lie in wait for them in every strategem(of war)-Surah 9:5
Whereas, Christianity instructs its followers to love their emenies.
The Bible tells Christ's followers to "Love your enemies, bless them that hate you" (Matt 5:44)
One can see why Comedy Central sidestepped islam and their Religion of(snicker)Peace.
18
posted on
04/28/2006 12:30:21 PM PDT
by
Proud Conservative2
("When people show you who they are...BELIEVE THEM the first time..." Maya Angelou)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
""Canada has taken the extraordinary step of allowing Muslims in that country to be governed by Islamic law (Shariah) when it comes to disputes over property and family issues, including marriage and divorce."
This is wrong, wrong, and wrong."
They'll rue the day they tried to please these FANATICS!
19
posted on
04/28/2006 12:33:33 PM PDT
by
Proud Conservative2
("When people show you who they are...BELIEVE THEM the first time..." Maya Angelou)
To: -YYZ-
20
posted on
04/28/2006 12:36:28 PM PDT
by
Proud Conservative2
("When people show you who they are...BELIEVE THEM the first time..." Maya Angelou)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson