"And thanks for the laughable letter in defense of the Nazi dupe Bandera. Gee, what an unimpeachable source - his grandson. "
Well this article says that a US staff member of Patton received a warning from Bandera - that Stalin had targeted Patton. Why would Patton execute him?
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:6jef4036KzYJ:www.ukrweekly.com/Archive/1996/409612.shtml+patton+bandera&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2&ie=UTF-8
And if you don't believe that Bandera was in a nazi concentration camp, would you believe the Encyclopedia Britannica?
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:E9_B4nN68vUJ:wwwa.britannica.com/eb/article-30082+bandera+concentration+camp&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=33&ie=UTF-8
And we respectfully request that you not trash this post too much - we don't want it winding up in Smokey Back Room.
1. I didn't say Bandera wasn't put into a concentration camp - I said he was put there after he gave the Nazis control of Western Ukraine and didn't toe the line.
2. The Ukraine Weekly is hardly an unimpeachable source on what Patton's staff did or did not receive. a.) Skubnik was NOT on Patton's staff, and b.) The US Dept of Justice Nazi hunter (Loftus) provides ample evidence of Bandera's war crimes - and it's all at the Wiesenthal Center, btw.