[RHINO369]

"Would a lack of that function be considered "normal?""

No, without a doubt homosexuals are not normal.

I think the truth behind whether someone was raised to be gay or whether its genetic is probably somewhere in the middle. All I can figure is that once people are gay they don't usually go back. That doesn't mean there should be gay marriage because there's alot of things we can't change that are bad.

[johnboy]

about four or five years ago, a major prohomo organization in san fransisco conducted a survey/study on the sexual practices of the homos in san fransisco and it transpires that you are, indeed, correct: homosexuals are not normal.

despite the way they are portrayed in the media (just like us, but unfortunately attracted to others of their own sex), they are overwhelmingly some of the sickest, weirdest, most disgusting people imaginable.

it has been years since i read the study, and i have yet to be able to even hint to another the things that the overwhelming majority of these people routinely do. (involving feces, urine, drugs, you name it. ugh. sick, sick, sick.

if i so much as suggested to my wife that we try something like, she would divorce me post haste. and obtain custody of the children, too, i would wager.

[Das Outsider]

All I can figure is that once people are gay they don't usually go back. That doesn't mean there should be gay marriage because there's alot of things we can't change that are bad.

You've given a good response, and I appreciate that. There could be many factors influencing homosexuals to remain in the lifestyle, i.e., social pressure inside gay circles, personal obligation, deep-seated intimacy issues, and what have you.

The growing number of of ex-gays seems to challenge the idea that homosexuality is some sort of lifelong, though benign and value-neutral, curse from the triune god who art in Coding, Transcription, and Translation.