Posted on 04/27/2006 2:54:14 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
WASHINGTON - The Pentagon is considering shipping to Iraq a weapon that shoots an invisible column of energy to cause intolerable pain without killing its target.
Known as the Active Denial System, the weapon was tested a third and final time in Florida last week and could be deployed if gets Pentagon approval, according to Department of Defense spokesman Lt. Col. Brian Maka. The weapon has been touted as a crowd-control device because it would allow U.S. forces to stop, deter and turn back an advancing adversary without applying deadly force.
Critics say the weapon would cause more harm than good and that there are safer, more effective ways to control crowds. People who cannot escape from the beam could face serious injury. It also superheats metal and other objects like coins, earrings or glass, which can then burn skin. As a result, the weapon could agitate crowds, forcing U.S. troops to fire traditional weapons, critics say.
“It would just outrage the public,” said Edward Hammonds, of the Sunshine Project, which opposes biological weapons.
The weapon is mounted on a Humvee and controlled by a joystick with a trigger. A 3- or 4-foot-wide beam is fired from an antenna and travels at the speed of light.
The beam heats the top 1/64th of an inch of skin to about 130 degrees in two seconds. Humans feel pain at 113 degrees. The test record for staying in front of the beam without fleeing is three seconds, said Rich Gracie, spokesman for the Air Force Research Laboratory which developed the weapon.
Two years ago, Gracie himself was tested with the weapon, which was fired from several hundred yards. He said it’s extremely painful, but safe. At first the sensation felt like someone opened an oven on his back, he said, and then a fiery pain shot from his back, up through his body and back down. He lasted two seconds before jumping for cover.
“It’s pretty horrific,” Gracie said. “It felt like your body was on fire.”
Well, I'm proud to be an American, 'cause at least I know I'm free! /s
PING!
Just wait'll the drunken sports rioters get a load of this under some future administration...
The ACLU and Democrats in Congress will cry about cruel and unusual
Approaching our convoys will cause you great pain.
Umm, the alternative is shooting them.
Think of how history would have been different if this was used at Kent State, instead of the .30-06.
Don't be a wiener. Its low level micro radiation, it is non-lethal, and although painful, does not leave any permanent damage.
Feels like really bad sunburn that has been smacked... but hardly something to whipper like a little girl like you are.
But if you think we should just shoot bullets and bombs instead of this 'inhumane' temporary sunburn approach... thats your call.
War of the Worlds.....let's use it at the Mexican border now and set it at max times 10.
Outfit all the Minuteman with a handheld version!!
“It would just outrage the public,” said Edward Hammonds, of the Sunshine Project, which opposes biological weapons.
Dontcha just love putzheads like this. "it would outrage the public" Apparently, he wants the public to be shot rather than outraged.
Won't somebody organize a "Boston Tea Party"?
I'm just rarin to march on Washington......throw the bums out!
Huh? For one, it's not "biological" and for another, as a non-lethal alternative weapon, I can't see how it could "outrage" the quote "public" [in his mind, his liberal wussie friends as portrayed by MSM journalists] more than a row-mow with automatic weapons.
No pain, no gain.
No pain, no gain.
I think your comments are off-base. Think about it for a minute: would you rather have some pain, which will pass, or would you rather be DEAD from BULLETS or BOMBS? Is the choice that tough for you to make?
Currently being installed under Tony Snow's podium...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.