Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grampa Dave
possible negative impact

Possibly because rooters doesn't consider a declining stock market as a negative. Remember they're 1st cousin to the Commie News Network.
Maybe my memory is defective, but it sure seems that back in the 50's and 60's rooters was a credible news source.

22 posted on 04/27/2006 8:26:31 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ASA Vet

"Maybe my memory is defective, but it sure seems that back in the 50's and 60's rooters was a credible news source."

I can remember my parents and Grandfather calling them Rooters and not being very positive.

"Possibly because rooters doesn't consider a declining stock market as a negative. Remember they're 1st cousin to the Commie News Network."

My Granddad had a great ability to spot communists, and he felt that Rooters was pro communist if not all commie.

Last but not least Rooters is basically impossible to find the true ownership. Shortly after 9/11 they banned the word terrorist from being used in any of their sanitized reports on the WOT. At that time the internet was stating a super Rich Opecker Prince, who lived in London, was the controlling owner of Rooters. He was the reason for the no terrorism tag being used with Islamofascist terrorism.


24 posted on 04/27/2006 9:02:49 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson