No problem.
You:Oh...We have secured our borders after 9/11?
Me:We haven't made any arrests at the border since 9/11?
As I said:
You asked me a rhetorical question grounded in hyperbole that doesn't logically follow from my statement.
I responded in kind.
My statement remains unaddressed by you.
Thanks.
And the point of repeating yourself is for....your own reading amusement? To see yourself in print? I'm at a loss, otherwise, as repeating your opinions doesn't make more true your unsubstantiated opinion that "the reason employer enforcement/arrests decreased is because border enforcement funding increased."
The facts I've posted contradict your opinions.
The point of this article: "Bush favors bestowing citizenship upon illegals." This, I said (in an earlier post), comes as no surprise. The reason? FACT 1: he hasn't secured the borders, FACT 2: he has slashed the budget for Border Patrol Agents, and FACT 3: employer arrests have decreased during his term.
And because actions really do speak louder than words, I am not surprised by the statements in this article.
Now, if you have evidence that the facts I've posted are incorrect, please feel free to post it and I'll read it. Otherwise, your unsubstantiated opinion/conclusion as to why employer arrests/enforcement has decreased under his presidency is just that, unsubstantiated opinion.