It's really hard to make a "fair" comparison between the two.
Clinton's policies helped lead us into a situation where we had to go to war to address the problems we faced, and in order to fight that war we had to spend insane amounts of money to equip our military, and we've wasted immense amounts of money as a result of not having a competent and capable intelligence community because Clinton gutted it and drove out most of the competent people.
A lot of Clinton's policies have caused a lot of damage in many different ways, and Bush has been left cleaning up the mess.
However, even if none of that were the case, Bush has been horribly irresponsible with our tax dollars.
Comparing them in a fair manner isn't easy, but it's not hard to see that both have been bad.
I'm inclined to think that Clinton was worse, but the perscription drug plan and illegal immigratons enforcement under Bush may result in him costing us even more in the long run.
I agree, having created a site called Clinton's Bin Laden-gate, but I disagree having supported both the War in Afghanistan and Iraq, because our mission has focused more on nation building in both those countries while even the President has repeatedly made politically correct statements about how Islam is a religion of peace. Furthermore, you may surprised to learn that defense spending really hasn't increased nowhere to the extent non-defense discreationary spending has...