To: Jaded; wideawake; aimhigh
Artificial insemination is NOT a necessary treatment. It is an elective procedure...Spoken like a true liberal. The doctor wasn't judging them. He was refusing to let himself violate his own morals...LOL! Refusing to inseminate someone violates the Hippocratic Oath? You're unclear on the concept. Patients, IMHO, should allow doctors to live by their consciences rather than hauling them before a judge for refusing to perform immoral elective procedures...Am I reading something different that you people? I thought the article was about FERTILITY treatments...
58 posted on
04/26/2006 8:59:40 AM PDT by
meandog
(Mohammad was not a prophet but a pedophile!)
To: meandog
Am I reading something different that you people? I thought the article was about FERTILITY treatments... From the Article:
"I trusted my doctors and then they humiliated my family and me by refusing to perform the insemination procedure after they'd been treating me and promising it to me for nearly a year," she said.
Reading Is Fundamental.
59 posted on
04/26/2006 9:04:02 AM PDT by
pgyanke
(Christ has a tolerance for sinners; liberals have a tolerance for sin.)
To: meandog
She is infertile in so far as she hasn't had sex with a man.
That seems to be the extent of her infertility.
76 posted on
04/26/2006 9:48:01 AM PDT by
It's me
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson