Replies

Well I don't know who I'd vote for, baddog. I suppose if the GOP would run McCain I'd seriously consider voting for him. If the Dems ran Kerry I'd consider voting for him (both he and McCain are, after all, men who actually fought in combat, unlike our current leader -- and don't give me the flip/flop argument about Kerry. Anyone who doesn't at least consider a change mind if new evidence points in a different direction is a fool). Hillary Clinton doesn't stand a chance of winning either way so it doesn't really matter what her politics are, enough people just don't like her that it's kind of a moot point. Same goes for Condoleeza Rice in the opposite direction. Jeb Bush is too much of a crook and he'd just be more of the same from the Bush dynasty, so no thanks to that. Dean is also too polarizing and probably wouldn't be a very effective leader because of that fact. Who else is there? Can I still write in Mickey Mouse?

If the Dems ran Kerry I'd consider voting for him

If the Democrats ran Kerry they would be more the fool than I take them for.

And Democracy often does start with the barrel of a gun. The United States comes to mind.

Kerry can't win and second tries rarely gather traction. Same for Gore if he has any brains at all. Condoleeza would force people to examine their consciences and I think that she would be a terrific candidate, but probably for Veep. McCain is too brittle and not that bright. Allen is a serious possibility and Evan Bayh is out there as a possibility for the democrats.

Hillary is going to run, but she is a horrible campaigner. Her numbers go down every time she opens her mouth. But she has the FBI files or their current generation and people know that she will use them.

Mitt might make a run. Biden is an idjet. Brownback is a candidate in his own mind only. Hagel would like to be president if he didn't have to work for it.

Now the real question is who will win?