Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustDoItAlways

Assuming Saddam did not have WMD, the fact that Saddam's generals thought they did have them makes it preposterous to expect that our intelligence services could get behind that and determine the truth of the matter before hand.


18 posted on 04/26/2006 6:20:50 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Buckhead
Assuming Saddam did not have WMD, the fact that Saddam's generals thought they did have them makes it preposterous to expect that our intelligence services could get behind that and determine the truth of the matter before hand.

You are EXACTLY correct.

We know he HAD them, We KNOW he USED them. It is IRRELEVANT at this stage of the game to hypothesize what happened to them. But if we must I find the simple explanation to always be closest to the TRUTH.

So we have two possibilities.........He destroyed them and lied about it to his Generals or he HID them and lied about it to the WORLD.

Which scenario is MOST likely?

51 posted on 04/26/2006 7:52:36 AM PDT by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson