To: LS
I tend to believe Richard Clarke knew more than he is telling.
www.9-11commission.gov
Page 128
The original sealed indictment had added that al Qaeda had reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.109This passage led Clarke, who for years had read intelligence reports on Iraqi-Sudanese cooperation on chemical weapons, to speculate to Berger that a large Iraqi presence at chemical facilities in Khartoum was probably a direct result of the IraqAl Qida agreement. Clarke added that VX precursor traces found near al Shifa were the exact formula used by Iraq.110This language about al Qaedas understanding with Iraq had been dropped, however, when a superseding indictment was filed in November 1998.111
12 posted on
04/26/2006 6:10:24 AM PDT by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: P-40
Amen, bro. BTW, do you happen to know any WW II vets who flew off aircraft carriers?
38 posted on
04/26/2006 7:07:54 AM PDT by
LS
To: P-40
"This language about al Qaedas understanding with Iraq had been dropped, however, when a superseding indictment was filed in November 1998."
Do you have the superseded indictment where they changed the wording around?
82 posted on
04/29/2006 3:54:59 PM PDT by
Milligan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson