You paraphrase as such. I am considered FROBL, because I refuse to be subject to providing papers upon request, and I refuse to penalize employers for not being document specialists. I refuse to consider a wall on American soil. I have no problem with mandating bar codes, RFID, and tattoos for foreign nationals that are from any country that does not participate in the visa waiver program (including Mexico). I favor building a wall on the Mexican side of the border in the event that the Mexican government does not take immediate and effective action to secure their border. I favor diplomatic arm twisting of Mexico, and military backed regime change in the event that Mexico can not come into compliance with visa waiver criteria, and NAFTA/CAFTA regulations. The president is responsible for the execution of legislation. He has failed on border policy. He has done very well on tax relief, following through on judicial nominations (Meyers aside), and prosecuting the military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq. DPW and Mexican border policy were miserable abject failures. How do you like me now?
Thats all well and good but has little to do with the issue.
Those statements were made by the Secure America group and/or Numbers USA. It was the whole point of their march.
I'm not trying to single you or anyone else out, but the heart of the issue is whether an individual agree with these statements.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. You, me, Kristinn, or anyone else.
If I agreed with those statements, I would join their demonstration. If I didn't agree, I wouldn't join the demomstration. You, Kristinn, or anybody would have the same choice.
There are a very large number of people at FR who agree with those statement, so it is not an egregious position.
Consequently, I am bewildered why anyone and everyone on this thread wants to hem and haw and avoid saying where they stand.