Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LDS Church signs letter on traditional marriage: U.S. religious leaders aim to sway Senate vote
The Deseret News ^ | 4/25/2006 | Stephen Speckman

Posted on 04/25/2006 11:31:45 AM PDT by Utah Girl

An LDS official and 49 religious leaders from around the country have signed a letter that calls for a U.S. constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

Members of Utah's gay and lesbian community called the letter, written on behalf of the Religious Coalition for Marriage, a political "distraction" and hurtful.

Elder Russell M. Nelson, a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, signed on behalf of the LDS Church. The letter is intended to help sway the U.S. Senate, which is expected to vote in June on a resolution that calls for the marriage amendment.

The LDS Church joined other religious bodies and leaders in signing the letter "to protect and preserve the institution of marriage between a man and a woman," according to a church statement on its Web site at www.lds.org.

The statement went on to advise LDS Church members to be civil and respectful of each other when participating in public debate on moral, social and political issues that can become "divisive."

LDS Church spokesman Dale Bills declined comment Monday. Bills referred questions to the church's statement on its Web site.

While only one of 50 signatures on the letter was an LDS leader, 16 were Catholic bishops and archbishops.

The large turnout for the Catholic Church follows a vote last month by the Administrative Committee of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to reaffirm its support of a federal marriage amendment. In 2003 the committee issued the statement, "Promote, Preserve, Protect Marriage."

The LDS Church has previously aired its opinion on marriage in the document "The Family: A Proclamation to the World." Read publicly in 1995 by LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley, the proclamation says, "Marriage between a man and a woman is essential to his eternal plan" and that children should be reared by a father and mother.

The recent letter from religious leaders is posted at www.religiouscoalitionformarriage.org. The letter is intended to sway the Senate in favor of the resolution for the "Marriage Protection Amendment."

The resolution calls for a constitutional amendment that would provide a national definition of marriage. The Senate is expected to vote a second time on the resolution June 6. The resolution passed the House but failed once before in the Senate. Approval by the Senate would send the resolution to voters for a final say.

"We are convinced that this is the only measure that will adequately protect marriage from those who would circumvent the legislative process and force a redefinition of it on the whole of our society," the letter reads.

Signatures on the letter include leaders from the Baptist, Episcopal, Greek Orthodox and Lutheran churches, two rabbis and officials from religious groups like Focus on the Family, led by founder James Dobson. A complete list of signers is posted on the Web site for the Religious Coalition for Marriage.

A federal amendment would echo what took place in Utah in 2004, when 66 percent of voters passed Amendment 3, which changed the Utah Constitution to specifically ban gay marriages.

Utah's only gay state senator, Scott McCoy, D-Salt Lake, said the recent letter is an attempt by Republicans to rescue their "pitiful" place in the polls right now by pandering to their right-wing, religious-fundamentalist base.

"Honestly, that's what this is about," McCoy said Monday. "This is an attempt at electoral distraction."

McCoy added that for every church represented on the letter, there is a faction of that church that believes the exact opposite.

Inactive LDS members Millie and Gary Watts co-chair Family Fellowship, a support and education group for an estimated 1,700 LDS families with gay and lesbian members. The Watts are parents of six children, including a gay son and lesbian daughter.

"I feel badly that the (LDS) church has to again re-emphasize its belief that marriage is between a man and a woman," Millie Watts said. "It hurts. It may unite other families, but it hurts my family."

Rather than frown upon gay relationships, Watts would like to see society and its churches spend more time on encouraging monogamy and helping to fortify relationships, gay or otherwise.

Valerie Larabee, executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Community Center, said she wasn't surprised by the recent letter. "I wish that we would pay more attention to helping people than hurting people," she said.

Larabee said the letter contributes toward gay and lesbian people not being treated equally. "If you alter the Constitution," she added, "you're not going to have equality."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
I remember the First Presidency issuing the Proclamation on the Family in 1996, and thinking that it was so redundant. As it turns out, it was prescient.
1 posted on 04/25/2006 11:31:49 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl

Members of Utah's gay and lesbian community called the letter, written on behalf of the Religious Coalition for Marriage, a political "distraction" and hurtful.



Wait a minute. Utah HAS a Gay and Lesbian community?


2 posted on 04/25/2006 11:35:52 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

There are gays and lesbians everywhere. Hadn't you noticed?


3 posted on 04/25/2006 11:37:14 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: MineralMan

There are gays and lesbians everywhere. Hadn't you noticed?



Yes. Unfortunately, yes.


5 posted on 04/25/2006 11:38:45 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Utah Girl


LDS thinks marriage is a man and woman?

Don't they mean a man and women?


7 posted on 04/25/2006 11:42:35 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farallon

Used to be the love that dare not speak it's name. These days it's the love that won't STFU.


8 posted on 04/25/2006 11:43:54 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Yes. Isn't it funny that every election year we have a debate on gay marriage, and then after the election everyone forgets about it and nothing happens?

This is political tricks and nothing more.

9 posted on 04/25/2006 11:45:05 AM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

typical homoadvocates.

They dismiss as irrelevant that which does not advocate same sex genital playing.


10 posted on 04/25/2006 11:45:33 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

It never fails--say anything about Utah and the idiots that think the Church still practices polygamy come out of the woodwork and show their asininity in public forums. Gag!


11 posted on 04/25/2006 11:47:10 AM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus


Polygamy has been in the LDS since its inception.

Mention anything Mormon and the hypersensitive nutcases come out.

Get over yourself.


12 posted on 04/25/2006 11:48:52 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
idiots that think the Church still practices polygamy

I don't care about the polygamy, I just think the entire premise behind LDS is hogwash.

13 posted on 04/25/2006 11:50:18 AM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus

Perhaps he was speaking to when the husband after death raises one or more wives. I've read the book of Mormon you had better watch who you refer to as an idiot.


14 posted on 04/25/2006 11:51:03 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
Polygamy has been in the LDS since its inception.

No, it hasn't.

15 posted on 04/25/2006 11:51:25 AM PDT by Spiff ("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
"I feel badly that the (LDS) church has to again re-emphasize its belief that marriage is between a man and a woman," Millie Watts said. "It hurts. It may unite other families, but it hurts my family."

Your hurt feelings are outweighed by the higher good of the common good, Ms. Watts.

Sorry. Feelings don't trump everything else.

16 posted on 04/25/2006 11:51:45 AM PDT by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy

no they are not everywhere, they are just squeeky wheel lound mouthed sex fetishists who get excited when people know about their deviancies in the bedroom.

2.7% (their number) of the population is not everywhere.


17 posted on 04/25/2006 11:52:00 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
Don't they mean a man and women?

No, not since 1890, when the LDS changed their rules. Any polygamists now are outside the church, as demonstrated in the new HBO series, "Big Love".

18 posted on 04/25/2006 11:52:16 AM PDT by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana

I know the Watts family. They have two children who are gay/lesbian. They don't have much to do with the LDS church anymore. It is very sad.

And you are quite right. Just because a small minority doesn't want their feelings hurt does not mean we should not stand on principle and say that marriage is between a man and a woman.


19 posted on 04/25/2006 11:55:36 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

I'm hooked on Big Love. Just cracks me up!


20 posted on 04/25/2006 11:56:51 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson